Posts Tagged ‘policy’

Health IT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Meeting

October 21st, 2009

Health IT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Meeting

Note about this meetingThe Workgroup will be hearing testimony from invited experts and stakeholders in the area of electronic exchange of laboratory information. They met on October 20, 2009.  Here is a link to their agenda.

CALL TO ORDER
• Judy Sparrow, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.  Overview (warning: PPT file)

Overview of Meeting
• Deven McGraw, Chair, Information Exchange Workgroup
• Micky Tripathi, Co‐Chair, Information Exchange Workgroup Background
• Angela Brice-Smith, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
• Kelly Cronin, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Part I: Business Issues related to the Electronic Exchange of Laboratory Data
• Mike Nolte, GE Health Systems
• Vasu Manjrekar, eClinicalWorks
• Phil Marshall, WebMD
• Tim Ryan, Quest Diagnostics
• Susan Neill, Texas Department of State Health Services

Part II: Business Issues related to the Electronic Exchange of Laboratory Data
• Laura Rosas, New York City Primary Care Information Project
• Sarah Chouinard, Primary Care Systems, Inc. and Community Health Network of West Virginia
• Raymond Scott, Axolotl Corporation
• Areg Boyamyan and Jim Timmons, Foundation Laboratory

Regulatory and Policy Issues
• Joy Pritts, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute
• Don Horton, LabCorp
• Jonah Frohlich, California Health and Human Service Agency
• Walter Sujansky, Sujansky & Associates

Public Comment

Some excerpts:

Laura Rosas, New York City Primary Care Information Project (PDF file):

“Unfortunately, electronic lab interfaces have proved to be one of the greatest barriers encountered in this project. Through great effort on the part of our EHR vendor, commercial laboratories, and the PCIP’s dedicated staff, we have managed to provide electronic lab interfaces to approximately two-thirds of our practices over a period of two years. It has proven nearly impossible under current processes to ensure that practices have an electronic laboratory interface at the same time that they go “live” on their EHR. Many of these practices waited months before they had an electronic interface, and subsequently needed to create complicated “workarounds” in the interim. On average, implementing, testing, and validating a lab interface for a PCIP practice takes about 10-14 weeks.”

Jonah Frohlich, California Health and Human Service Agency (PDF file)

“There is virtually no standardization of lab messaging in the industry today. In my experience working on ELINCS projects – initiatives that use highly constrained HL7 messages or “implementation guides” to support electronic lab results delivery – all hospitals needed considerable outside technical assistance to comply with the standard. Labs required assistance to adopt the LOINC coding scheme; a standard naming system for lab tests, and labs were unprepared to adopt SNOMED or UCUM; standard coding schemes for results and units of measures. The lab information systems the hospitals operated had internal “proprietary” codes for test names, and they had little expertise to “map” these codes to LOINC. These labs relied heavily on external technical assistance to do the necessary mapping for the most frequent 95% of reported tests as required by ELINCS – approximately 150 of the thousands of reportable tests in their databases.”

Vasu Manjrekar, eClinicalWorks (PDF file)

“Despite a concentrated effort on the part of eClinicalWorks and its Reference Lab partners over past several years, it has been difficult to provide electronic laboratory interface at go “live” on their EHR. Many of these practices wait months before they get an electronic interface, and subsequently needed to create “workarounds” in the interim. On average, implementing, testing, and validating a lab interface for a practice with National Reference Lab companies take about anywhere from 4-14 weeks.”

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

“Meaningful” Progress Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange

October 1st, 2009

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

I recently reported on our announcement of State Health Information Technology Grants and grants to establish Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers, as authorized under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).

Today I want to discuss the important term “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHRs) – both as a concept that underlies the movement toward an electronic health care environment and as a practical set of standards that will be issued as a proposed regulation by the end of 2009.

The HITECH Act provisions of the Recovery Act create a truly historic opportunity to transform our health system through unprecedented investments in the development of a nationwide electronic health information system.  This system will ultimately help facilitate, inform, measure, and sustain improvements in the quality, efficiency, and safety of health care available to every American.  Simply put, health professionals will be able to give better care, and their patients’ experience of care will improve, leading to better health outcomes overall.

As many of you are aware, the HITECH Act provides incentive payments to doctors and hospitals that adopt and meaningfully use health information technology.  Eligible physicians, including those in solo or small practices, can receive up to $44,000 over five years under Medicare or $63,750 over six years under Medicaid for being meaningful users of certified electronic health records.  Hospitals that become meaningful EHR users could receive up to four years of financial incentive payments under Medicare beginning in 2011, and up to six years of incentive payments under Medicaid beginning in October 2010.

The HITECH Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help those who want to improve their care delivery, and will serve as a catalyst to accelerate and smooth the path to HIT adoption by more individual providers and organizations.  The dollars are tangible evidence of a national determination to bring health care into the 21st century.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is charged with coordinating nationwide efforts to implement and use the most advanced health information technology and the electronic exchange of health information. ONC is working with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), through an open and transparent process, on efforts to officially designate what constitutes “meaningful use.”

ONC has already engaged in a broad range of efforts to support the development of a formal definition of meaningful use.  The HITECH Act designated a federal advisory committee, the HIT Policy Committee, with broad representation from major health care constituencies, to provide recommendations to ONC on meaningful use.  The HIT Policy Committee has provided two sets of recommendations, informed by input from a variety of stakeholders.  ONC and CMS have also conducted a series of listening sessions to solicit feedback from more than 200 representatives of various constituent groups and an open comment period where over 800 public comments were submitted and reviewed.  The second set of recommendations on meaningful use was issued at a July 16 HIT Policy Committee meeting and details can be found at healthit.hhs.gov/policycommittee.

CMS is expected to publish a formal definition of meaningful use, for the purposes of receiving the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, by December 31, 2009. At that time, the public will be able to comment on the definition, and such comments will be considered in reaching any final definition of the term.

By focusing on “meaningful use,” we recognize that better health care does not come solely from the adoption of technology itself, but through the exchange and use of health information to best inform clinical decisions at the point of care.  Meaningful use of EHRs, we anticipate, will also enable providers to reduce the amount of time spent on duplicative paperwork and gain more time to spend with their patients throughout the day.  It will lead us toward improvements and sustainability of our health care system that can only be attained with the help of a reliable and secure nationwide electronic health information system.

The concept of meaningful use is simple and inspiring, but we recognize that it becomes significantly more complex at a policy and regulatory level.  As a result, we expect that any formal definition of “meaningful use” must include specific activities health care providers need to undertake to qualify for incentives from the federal government.

Ultimately, we believe “meaningful use” should embody the goals of a transformed health system.  Meaningful use, in the long-term, is when EHRs are used by health care providers to improve patient care, safety, and quality.

What’s next?

As stated above, the next step in our process is a notice of proposed rulemaking in late 2009 with a public comment period in early 2010.  As this process unfolds, we will continue to talk and share experiences about transitioning to EHRs, and to help deepen understanding among physicians and hospitals about the use of EHRs.  We will also present programs designed to help smooth the transition process, and identify activities physicians and hospitals can engage in now to promote adoption of EHRs.  As efforts advance, we will turn our attention to other necessary supporting programs, some of which you will hear more about in the coming weeks, including defining what constitutes a “certified” EHR, which is one of the requirements to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

In the meantime, what can providers do to move toward becoming “meaningful users” – even in the absence of a formal definition?  Naturally, while understanding that the final definition will be adopted through a formal rulemaking process, it will be helpful to be as familiar as possible with the discussion of meaningful use criteria to date.  (You will find that information posted at healthit.hhs.gov/meaningfuluse.)

Armed with an understanding of the discussion of meaningful use as it unfolds, providers can begin to consider how their own practices or organizations might be reshaped to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through the use of an electronic health record system.  Be assured you will not be alone as you seek to adopt an EHR system.  Through our recently announced collaborative HITECH grants programs and others to be initiated later this year, we will continue to support providers in moving forward.  Additional details about the grants are also available in my previous update and at healthit.hhs.gov/HITECHgrants.

To some providers, particularly small or already stretched physician practices or small, rural hospitals, the path toward meaningful use may still seem arduous.  To others, who would just prefer to stick with the “status quo,” it may seem like an unwanted intrusion.  We believe that the time has come for coordinated action.  The price of inaction – in adverse events, lost patient lives, delayed or improper treatments, unnecessary procedures, excessive costs, and so on – is just too high, and will only get worse.

There is much at stake and much to do.  We must relieve the crushing burden of health care costs in this country by improving efficiency, and assuring the highest level of patient care and safety regardless of geography or demographics.  By using current technologies in a meaningful way, as well as technology to be developed in the future, we will take great strides toward solving some of the most vexing problems facing our health care system and creating a new platform for innovative solutions to health care.

I look forward to providing periodic updates, and to continued interactions with all the communities that have so much to gain from this profound transformation.

Sincerely,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

CDC Recovery Act Communities Putting Prevention to Work — State and Territory Initiative

September 30th, 2009

State and Territory Initiative – CDC Recovery Act Communities Putting Prevention to Work

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced a funding opportunity for communities and tribes to apply for $373 million in cooperative agreements for the comprehensive public health initiative, Communities Putting Prevention to Work, to be led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (1.1M–PDF) states that “$650M shall be provided to carry out evidence-based clinical and community-based prevention and wellness strategies authorized by the Public Health Service Act that deliver specific, measurable health outcomes that address chronic disease rates.” The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has developed an initiative in response to the Act. The goal of this initiative – Communities Putting Prevention to Work – is to reduce risk factors and prevent/delay chronic disease and promote wellness in both children and adults. The initiative was launched by HHS in a press briefing held on September 17, 2009. In addition, a press release and fact sheet are available related to the announcement. The press release and fact sheet are also available as a PDF:

There are three major State and Territory components:

  1. Statewide Policy and Environmental Change: These policy activities will support and institutionalize healthy behaviors related to obesity control, nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco control and prevention. Strategies should be grounded in evidence and part of the MAPPS intervention model. All states and territories will be eligible for a base funding amount determined by population.
  2. Competitive Special Policy and Environmental Change Initiative: States and territories can compete for funds for special policy initiatives. The funds should be used to implement at least one or more high-impact additional policy, environment or system change strategy to achieve health equity/eliminate health disparities in the area of physical activity, nutrition, or tobacco or a combination of these. Strategies should be gounded in evidence and part of the MAPPS intervention model.
  3. Tobacco Cessation through Quitlines and Media: under the direction of CDC, states and territories submitting quality applications will receive funding to expand tobacco quit lines, in concert with expanded cessation media campaigns. States and territories will receive funding based on the number of smokers in their jurisdiction. Additional funds will be used for national efforts to support surge capacity, additional quit line monitoring and quality improvement measures.
Key DatesEvents
Letter of Intent Deadline
(Community Initiative Only): October 30, 2009

Application Deadline (Community Initiative): December 1, 2009

Application Deadline (State and Territory Initiative): Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Conference Calls for Community Initiative

September 30, 2009– 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern — eligible applicants in Mountain and Pacific time zones.

October 1, 2009 – 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Eastern — eligible applicants in Atlantic, Eastern, and Central time zones.

October 1, 2009 – 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern — tribal applicants in all time zones
Conference Calls for State and Territory Initiative

Conference Calls for State and Territory Initiative

October 6, 2009 – 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern – applicants applying for State Competitive and Non-Competitive funding.

October 7, 2009 – 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern – applicants applying for Quitline funding.

October 7, 2009 – 8:00 p.m.  to 10:00 p.m. Eastern applicants from the Pacific Territories applying for non-competitive and quitline funding

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

Oregon Creates Health Insurance Exchange Quality Care Institute and Health Authority

September 29th, 2009

House Bill 2009 Establishes Oregon Health Authority Board and Oregon Health Authority

75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY–2009 Regular Session House Bill 2009

Establishes Oregon Health Authority Board and Oregon Health Authority and specifies duties, functions and powers. Transfers health and health insurance functions to authority from Department of Human Services and Department of Consumer and Business Services.
Creates Quality Care Institute and Oregon Health Insurance Exchange in Oregon Health Authority.
Requires authority to implement premium assistance program. Requires authority to streamline application process for medical assistance and premium assistance programs. Requires authority to increase reimbursement rates for health services providers participating in medical assistance programs.
Requires authority to conduct outreach for and marketing of medical assistance and premium assistance programs.
Creates tax on health insurance and managed care plans. Sets fixed rate for hospital assessment and removes sunset. Creates new cigarette tax. Establishes Oregon Health Authority Fund. Deposits moneys from taxes and assessments into fund. Continuously appropriates moneys in fund to authority for purpose of carrying out functions of authority.

(Duties of Oregon Health Authority Board)
SECTION 10. (1) The duties of the Oregon Health Authority Board are to:
(a) Be the policy-making and oversight body for the Oregon Health Authority established in section 11 of this 2009 Act and all of the authority¢s departmental divisions, including the Quality Care Institute and the Oregon Health Insurance Exchange described in sections 17 and 18 of this 2009 Act.
(b) Implement a program to provide health insurance premium assistance to all low and moderate income families residing in Oregon.
(c) Establish health benefit plans for individuals who are covered under the Public Employees Benefit Board and the Oregon Educators Benefit Board that will achieve optimal coordination among state agencies that provide health care benefits.
(d) Establish and continuously refine uniform, statewide health care quality standard for use by all purchasers of health care, third party payers and health care providers as quality performance benchmarks.
(e) Establish clinical standards and guidelines described in section 18 (3)(f)(B) of this 2009
Act.
(f) Approve and monitor community-centered health initiatives described in section 11 of this 2009 Act that are consistent with public health goals, strategies, programs and performance standards adopted by the board to improve the health of all Oregonians and shall regularly report to the Legislative Assembly on the accomplishments and needed changes to the initiatives.
(g) Establish cost control mechanisms to limit increases in health care costs in this state to an amount no greater than the U.S. City Average Consumer Price Index for medical care as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor minus one percent, by the year 2015.
(h) Work with the Oregon congressional delegation to advance the adoption of or changes in federal policy to promote Orego’ns comprehensive health reform plan.
(i) Establish an essential benefit package for all insurance offered through the Oregon Health Insurance Exchange.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin