Posts Tagged ‘health it’

ONC Workforce Development Program

October 13th, 2010

ONC Health IT Workforce Development Program

In April, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) awarded $84 million in cooperative agreements for the Health IT Workforce Development Program to help ensure that health professionals have the technical support they need to adopt electronic health records.

The University of Texas at Austin’s Health IT Summer Certificate Program graduated its first class of students, who are now certified Health Information Managers and Exchange Specialists.

Health IT classes are under way at 84 community colleges that are using the curriculum developed through the Curriculum Development Centers Program.

All in all, ONC’s Health IT Workforce Development Program is expected to reduce the shortfall of skilled health IT professionals by 85 percent.

Community Colleges Participating in the Program

School

Region

City

State

Atlanta Technical College Exit DisclaimerDAtlantaGA
Bellevue College Exit DisclaimerABellevueWA
Bristol Community College Exit DisclaimerEFall RiverMA
Bronx Community College Exit DisclaimerEBronxNY
Brookdale Community College Exit DisclaimerELincroftNJ
Broward College – FL Exit DisclaimerDCoconut CreekFL
Burlington County College Exit DisclaimerEPembertonNJ
Butte CollegeBOrovilleCA
Camden County College Exit DisclaimerEBlackwoodNJ
Capital Community College Exit DisclaimerEHartfordCT
Catawba Valley Community College – NC Exit DisclaimerDHickoryNC
Central Piedmont Community College – NC Exit DisclaimerDCharlotteNC
Chattanooga State Community College – TNDChattanoogaTN
Cincinnati State Technical & Community College Exit DisclaimerCCincinnatiOH
College of Southern NevadaBLas VegasNV
Columbus State Community College Exit DisclaimerCColumbusOH
Community College of Allegheny County Exit DisclaimerEPittsburghPA
Community College of Baltimore County Exit DisclaimerEBaltimore CityMD
Community College of DC Exit DisclaimerEWashingtonDC
Community College of Vermont Exit DisclaimerEWaterburyVT
Cosumnes River CollegeBSacramentoCA
Cuyahoga Community College Exit DisclaimerCClevelandOH
Cypress College Exit DisclaimerBCypressCA
Dakota State University Exit DisclaimerAMadisonSD
Dallas County Comm Coll District – TX Exit DisclaimerDDallasTX
Delgado Community College – LA Exit DisclaimerDNew OrleansLA
Delta College Exit DisclaimerCUniversity CenterMI
Des Moines Area Community College Exit DisclaimerCAnkenyIA
Dyersburg State Community College – TN Exit DisclaimerDDyersburgTN
East LA College Exit DisclaimerBMonterey ParkCA
Essex County College Exit DisclaimerENewarkNJ
Florence/Darlington – SC Exit DisclaimerDFlorenceSC
Fresno City College Exit DisclaimerBFresnoCA
Gloucester County College Exit DisclaimerESewallNJ
Hinds Community College – MS Exit DisclaimerDRaymondMS
Houston Community College – TX Exit DisclaimerDHoustonTX
Indian River State College – FL Exit DisclaimerDFt. PierceFL
Itawamba Community College – MS Exit DisclaimerDTupeloMS
Jefferson Community & Technical College Exit DisclaimerDLouisvilleKY
Johnson County Community College Exit DisclaimerCOverland ParkKS
Kennebec Valley Community College Exit DisclaimerEFairfieldME
Kirkwood Community College Exit DisclaimerCCedar RapidsIA
Lake Region State College Exit DisclaimerADevil’s LakeND
Lansing Community College Exit DisclaimerCLansingMI
Los Rios Community College DistrictBSacramentoCA
Macomb Community CollegeCWarrenMI
Madison Area Technical College Exit DisclaimerCMadisonWI
Maricopa CollegeBPhoenixAZ
Metropolitan Community College Exit DisclaimerCOmahaNE
Midland College – TX Exit DisclaimerDMidlandTX
Milwaukee Area Technical College Exit DisclaimerCMilwaukeeWI
Mission College Exit DisclaimerBSanta ClaraCA
Montana Tech Exit DisclaimerAButteMT
Moraine Valley Community College Exit DisclaimerCPalos HillsIL
National Park Community College – AR Exit DisclaimerDHot SpringsAR
Normandale Community College Exit DisclaimerCBloomingtonMN
North Idaho College Exit DisclaimerACoeur d’AleneID
Northern Virginia Community College Exit DisclaimerEAnnadaleVA
Ocean County College Exit DisclaimerEToms RiverNJ
Orange Coast CollegeBCosta MesaCA
Passaic County Community College Exit DisclaimerEPatersonNJ
Pima CollegeBTucsonAZ
Pitt Community College – NC Exit DisclaimerDWintervilleNC
Portland Community College Exit DisclaimerAPortlandWA
Pueblo Community College Exit DisclaimerAPuebloCO
Raritan Valley Community College Exit DisclaimerEBranchburgNJ
Salt Lake Community College Exit DisclaimerASalt Lake CityUT
San Diego Mesa College Exit DisclaimerBSan DiegoCA
Santa Barbara City College Exit DisclaimerBSanta BarbaraCA
Santa Fe College – FL Exit DisclaimerDGainesvilleFL
Santa Monica College Exit DisclaimerBSanta MonicaCA
Sinclair Community College Exit DisclaimerCDaytonOH
Southern Maine Community College Exit DisclaimerESouth PortlandME
St. Louis Community College Exit DisclaimerCSt. LouisMO
Suffolk County Community College Exit DisclaimerEBrentwoodNY
Tidewater Community College Exit DisclaimerEVirginia BeachVA
Tulsa Community College – OK Exit DisclaimerDTulsaOK
U of Hawaii Community College – KapiolaniBHonoluluHI
Walters State Community College – TN Exit DisclaimerDMorristownTN
Wayne County Community College Exit DisclaimerCDetroitMI
West Virginia Northern Community College Exit DisclaimerEWheelingWV
Westchester Community College Exit DisclaimerEValhallaNY
TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

Final Rule for Temporary Certification Issued

June 18th, 2010

HITECH Temporary Certification of EHRs for Health IT

Today, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology issued its final rule for the temporary certification program. The program establishes a way for organizations to be authorized by the National Coordinator to test and certify electronic health record (EHR) technology. 

Use of certified EHR technology is a core requirement for eligible health care providers to qualify for payments under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

For more information on the temporary certification program, visit: http://healthit.hhs.gov/certification.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provides HHS with the authority to establish programs to improve health care quality, safety, and efficiency through the promotion of health information technology (HIT), including electronic health records (EHRs) and private and secure electronic health information exchange.

The HITECH legislation directs the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) to support and promote meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technology nationwide through the adoption of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria as well as the establishment of certification programs for HIT, such as EHR  technology..
 
About the Temporary Certification Program and ONC-ATCBs
To provide assurance to eligible professionals, eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) that the EHR technology they adopt will assist their achievement of meaningful use, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule to establish a temporary certification program for EHR technology on June 18, 2010. The rule outlines how organizations can become ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Bodies (ONC-ATCBs). Authorized by the National Coordinator, ONC-ATCB are required to test and certify that certain types of her technology (Complete EHRs and EHR Modules) are compliant with the standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria adopted by the HHS Secretary and meet the definition of “certified EHR technology”.

About the Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria
On January 13, 2010, the Secretary published in the Federal Register an interim final rule that adopted standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for HIT. A final rule, which will realign with the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs final rule, is expected to be released in the near future.

What Certification Means for Health Care Providers
EHR technology, certified by an ONC-ATCB must be used in order to qualify for incentive payments. The temporary certification program provides assurance that the EHR technology health care providers adopt is technically capable of supporting their efforts to achieve meaningful use.

What Certification Means for Developers of EHR Technology
The temporary certification program provides a way for developers of EHR technology to have their HIT tested and certified so that it can be subsequently adopted by eligible professionals, eligible hospitals and CAHs who seek to achieve meaningful use.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

Funding Opportunity for Two New Beacon Communities

May 26th, 2010

Two Additional Beacon Awards Totaling $30.3 Million

In early May, the Office of National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) at HHS announced awards of $220 million to 15 Beacon Communities across the nation to demonstrate a future where hospitals, clinicians, and patients use health IT in different ways to reform health care delivery within their communities and achieve meaningful and measurable improvements in health care quality, safety, and efficiency to benefit patients and taxpayers.

Today, we are pleased to announce (Word document) a new round of two additional Beacon awards totaling $30.3 million. To view the new Beacon funding opportunity, please visit http://healthit.hhs.gov/beacon.

Aaron McKethan

Program Director

Beacon Community Program, ONC

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Opportunity Overview

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC)

Funding Opportunity Title: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Funding to Beacon Communities

Announcement Type: New Competitive Program

Funding Opportunity Number: HHS-2010-ONC-BC-006

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number:  93.727

Key Dates and Submission Information: Applicants are required to submit a Letter of Intent to apply for this funding opportunity.  Applicants will be required to submit an application that will undergo screening for completeness and responsiveness.  Applications that pass this initial screening will then be evaluated through an objective review process.  Successful applications will result in the award of approximately two 31-month cooperative agreements.  Award decisions for Beacon Communities are anticipated to be made in mid August 2010.

Approx FundingFOA ReleasedLetters of Intent DueApplications DueCooperative Agreements AwardedAnticipated Start Date
$30.375 millionMay 26, 2010June 9, 2010

11:59 PM EST

BeaconCommunityGrants @ hhs.gov

June 28, 2010

5:00 PM EST

http://www.grants.gov

August 2010August 13, 2010

Note: Applicants are requested to pay close attention to the details of the application submission process outlined in Section IV (“Application and Submission Information”) of this document. The application submission process itself involves several steps. Previous experience suggests that applicants should take time to understand the process well in advance of when the applications are actually due to reduce the likelihood of experiencing difficulties during the submission process.

Executive Summary

The Beacon Community Cooperative Agreement Program will provide funding to communities to build and strengthen their health information technology (health IT) infrastructure and exchange capabilities to demonstrate the vision of the future where hospitals, clinicians and patients are meaningful users of health IT, and together the community achieves measurable improvements in health care quality, safety, efficiency, and population health. Awards will be made in the form of cooperative agreements to approximately two qualified non-profit organizations or government entities representing geographic health care communities. Selected communities must already be national leaders in the advancement of health IT, workflow redesign and care coordination, or quality monitoring and feedback.  In addition, successful communities must have advanced rates of electronic health record (EHR) adoption and health information exchange (HIE), and the readiness to incorporate health IT to advance community-level care coordination and quality monitoring and feedback. Cooperative agreement recipients will evolve and advance their existing competencies in these three areas over a 31-month performance period.  Individually and in aggregate, the Beacon Communities will generate and disseminate valuable lessons learned that will be applicable to the rest of the nation’s communities as they strive to build and leverage their health IT infrastructure for healthcare improvement.  Total funding for this funding opportunity announcement is $30,375,000.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

Beacon Communities to Lead the Way

May 13th, 2010

Beacon Communities Demonstrating Meaningful Use of Health IT

Beacon Community AwardeeFunding AmountBeacon Community Goals for Population Health in Service Area
Community Services Council of Tulsa, Tulsa, Okla.$12,043,948
  • Leverage broad community partnerships with hospitals, providers, payers, and government agencies  to expand a community-wide care coordination system, which will increase appropriate referrals for cancer screenings, decrease unnecessary specialist visits and (with telemedicine) increase access to care for patients with diabetes
Delta Health Alliance, Inc., Stoneville, Miss.$14,666,156
  • Focus on achieving improvements for diabetic patients by electronically linking isolated systems and practices for care management, medication therapy management and patient education
Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems, Brewer Maine$12,749,740
  • Expand community connectivity, including long-term care, primary care and specialist providers, to existing Health Information Exchange and promote the use of telemedicine and patient self-management in order to improve care for elderly patients and individuals needing long-term or home care
Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA$16,069,110
  • Enhance care for patients with pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure by creating a community-wide medical home, promoting Health Information Exchange and extending Geisinger’s proven model for practice redesign  to independent healthcare organizations throughout region
HealthInsight, Salt Lake City, Utah$15,790,181
  • Improve Diabetes management performance measures by increasing availability, accuracy and transparency of quality reporting, leverage Intermountain Healthcare’s strategies to reduce health systems costs throughout the region, and improve public health reporting
Indiana Health Information Exchange, INC., Indianapolis, Ind.$16,008,431
  • Expand the country’s largest Health Information Exchange to new community providers in order to improve cholesterol and blood sugar control for diabetic patients and reduce preventable re-admissions through telemonitoring of high risk chronic disease patients after hospital discharge
Inland Northwest Health Services, Spokane, Wash.$15,702,479
  • Focus on increasing preventive services for diabetic patients in rural areas by extending Health Information Exchange and establishing anchor institutions in close proximity to remote clinics that will promulgate successes in health IT supported care coordination
Louisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans, La.$13,525,434
  • Reduce racial health disparities and improve control of diabetes and smoking cessation rates by linking technically isolated health systems, providers, and hospitals; and empower patients by increasing their access to Personal Health Records
Mayo Clinic Rochester, d/b/a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.$12,284,770
  • Enhance patient management and, reduce costs costs associated with hospitalization and emergency services for patients with diabetes and childhood asthma and address reduce health disparities for underserved populations and rural communities
Rhode Island Quality Institute, Providence, R.I.$15,914,787
  • Improve the management of patients with diabetes through several health IT initiatives to support Rhode Island’s transition to the Patient Centered Medical Home model and adapt infrastructure proven to improve childhood immunizations in order to achieve improvements in adult immunization rates
Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Grand Junction, Colo.$11,878,279
  • Enable robust collection of clinical data from health systems, providers, and hospitals in order to inform practice redesign to improve blood pressure control in patients with diabetes and hypertension, increase smoking cessation counseling, and reduce unnecessary emergency department utilization and hospital re-admissions
Southern Piedmont Community Care Plan, Inc., Concord, N.C.$15,907,622
  • Improve care coordination for patients with diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and asthma by engaging patients and providers in bidirectional data sharing through a Health Record Bank, empowering patients and family members to participate in self-management through patient portals, and expanding access to care managers to facilitate post-discharge planning
The Regents of the University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif.$15,275,115
  • Expand pre-hospital emergency field care and electronic information transmission to improve outcomes for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, empower patients to engage in their own health management through web portal and cellular telephone technology, and improve continuity of care for veterans and military personnel through the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record initiative
University of Hawaii at Hilo, Hilo, Hawaii$16,091,390
  • Implement a region-wide Health Information Exchange and Patient Health Record solution and utilize secure, internet-based care coordination and tele-monitoring tools to increase access to specialty care for patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity in this rural, health-professional shortage area
Western New York Clinical Information Exchange, Inc., Buffalo, N.Y.$16,092,485
  • Utilize clinical decision support tools such as registries and point-of-care alerts and reminders and innovative telemedicine solutions to improve primary and specialty care for diabetic patients, decrease preventable emergency room visits, hospitalizations and re-admissions for patients with diabetes and congestive heart failure or pneumonia, and improve immunization rates among diabetic patients

More information about Beacon Communities can be found at: http://Healthit.hhs.gov/Programs/Beacon.

For information about other HHS Recovery Act programs, see http://www.hhs.gov/recovery

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

$267 Million for New Health IT Regional Extension Centers

April 11th, 2010

$267 Million Awarded to Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers (RECs).

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced on April 6th, that more than $267 million has been awarded to 28 additional non-profit organizations to establish Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers (RECs).

Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center Awardees

AwardeesArea of ResponsibilityFederal Share
Alaska eHealth Network, Anchorage, AlaskaAK$3,632,357
University of South Alabama, Mobile, Ala.AL$7,519,969
Arizona Health-e Connection, Phoenix, Ariz.AZ$10,791,644
Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, Calif.CA$15,625,910
eHealthConnecticut, Inc., Rocky Hill, Conn.CT$5,749,309
Quality Insights of Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Del.DE$5,859,716
University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fla.FL$7,669,328
Community Health Centers Alliance, Inc, St. Petersburg, Fla.FL$10,982,866
University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.FL$5,884,132
Hawaii Health Information Exchange, Honolulu, HawaiiHI, Pacific Territories$5,859,716
University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Lexington, Ky.KY$6,005,467
Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum, Baton Rouge, La.LA$6,207,802
HealthInfoNet, Manchester, MaineME$4,777,483
Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients, Baltimore, Md.MD$5,535,423
eQHealth Solutions, Inc , Baton Rouge, La.MS$4,289,613
The Curators of the University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo.MO$6,836,335
Mountain-Pacific Quality Health Foundation, Helena, Mont.MT,WY$5,020,754
New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.NJ$23,048,351
Quality Insights of Pennsylvania Inc. (Eastern), King of Prussia, Pa.PA$28,810,271
Quality Insights of Pennsylvania Inc. (Western), King of Prussia, Pa.PA$15,625,910
Ponce School of Medicine, Puerto RicoPR,VI$19,280,796
South Carolina Research Foundation, Columbia, S.C.SC$5,581,407
Dakota State University, Madison, S.D.SD$5,687,168
The TAMUS Health Science Center Research Foundation. College Station, TexasTX$5,279,970
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TexasTX$15,274,327
Dallas- Fort Worth Hospital Council Education and Research Foundation, Irving, TexasTX$8,488,513
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Lubbock, TexasTX$6,666,296
National Indian Health Board, District of ColumbiaUS$15,625,910
Total $267,616,743

“Regional extension centers will provide the needed hands-on, field support for all health care providers to advance the rapid adoption and use of health IT. RECs are a vital part of our overall efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of health care through the effective use of health IT,” said Dr. David Blumenthal, national coordinator for health information technology.

Complete listing of REC grant recipients and additional information about the Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers, see http://HealthIT.hhs.gov/programs/REC/.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin