Posts Tagged ‘CMS’

President Obama Announces Recovery Act Awards to Community Health Centers in More Than 30 States

December 10th, 2009

President Obama Announces Recovery Act Awards to Build, Renovate Community Health Centers in More Than 30 States

Program to Create Jobs in Low-Income Communities, Help CHCs Serve More Than 500,000 Additional Patients

WASHINGTON – Today President Obama announced nearly $600 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) awards to support major construction and renovation projects at 85 community health centers nationwide and help networks of health centers adopt Electronic Health Records (EHR) and other Health Information Technology (HIT) systems.  The awards are expected to not only create new job opportunities in construction and health care, but also help provide care for more than half a million additional patients in underserved communities.  The President also announced a new demonstration initiative to support the delivery of advanced primary care to Medicare beneficiaries through community health centers.

“Together, these three initiatives – funding for construction, technology and a medical home demonstration project – won’t just save more money, and create more jobs, they’ll give more people the peace of mind of knowing that health care will be there for them and their families when they need it,” said President Obama.  “Ultimately, that’s what health reform is really about.”

“One of the first investments we made through the Recovery Act was in supporting our nation’s community health centers – and today we build on that progress by funding new construction and improvement projects at more than 80 facilities nationwide,” said Vice President Biden.  “This is what the Recovery Act is all about – providing immediate assistance for hard-hit families, improving our nation’s infrastructure and creating new opportunities for stable, well-paid work.”

To qualify for funding, a health facility must be a Federally Qualified “Community” Health Center.  Grants of $508.5 million will be provided through the Facility Investment Program (FIP) program to address pressing health center facility needs. Also, as much as $88 million will be available to help Health Center Controlled Networks improve operational effectiveness and clinical quality in health centers by providing management, financial, technology and clinical support services.

The new Recovery Act funds are the latest in a series of grants awarded to community health centers, which deliver preventive and primary care services at more than 7,500 service delivery sites around the country to patients regardless of their ability to pay.  Health centers serve more than 17 million patients, about 40 percent of whom have no health insurance.

Both programs will be administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

President Obama directed the Department of Health and Human Services to implement a demonstration initiative designed to evaluate the impact of the advanced primary care practice model on access, quality and cost of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries served by community health centers.

This model, known as the “medical home,” promotes accessible, continuous, and coordinated family-centered care.  Developed and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the demonstration will last three years.  CMS anticipates that up to 500 health centers will participate.

“Because community health centers already provide comprehensive health care to people who face the greatest barriers to accessing care, these demonstration projects have the potential to support and improve the care delivered not only to Medicare beneficiaries, but also to others who rely on community health centers for primary care,” said HHS Secretary Kathleen G. Sebelius.

HRSA has received a total of $2 billion through the Recovery Act to expand health care services to low-income and uninsured individuals through its health center program. To date, nearly $1.9 billion of these funds have been awarded to community-based organizations across the country.

FIP grants are listed below.  They were awarded through a competitive process:

Name of Health CenterCityStateAward Amount
Health Services Inc.MontgomeryAla.$11,231,000
Seldovia Village TribeSeldoviaAlaska$2,258,091
Alaska Island Community ServicesWrangellAlaska$3,736,490
North Country Healthcare Inc.FlagstaffAriz.$7,433,776
Canyonlands Community Health CarePageAriz.$1,840,695
Clinica Sierra VistaBakersfieldCalif.$4,008,251
Solano County Health & Social Services Dept.FairfieldCalif.$2,194,196
South Central Family Health CenterLos AngelesCalif.$953,743
Contra Costa County Health Services Dept.MartinezCalif.$12,000,000
Golden Valley Health CenterMercedCalif.$9,573,010
Petaluma Health Center Inc.PetalumaCalif.$8,906,986
Clinica De Salud Del Valle De SalinasSalinasCalif.$2,327,857
Santa Clara Valley Health And Hospital SystemSan JoseCalif.$2,643,343
San Mateo County Health Services AgencySan MateoCalif.$1,765,876
Centro De Salud De La Comunidad San YsidroSan YsidroCalif.$9,754,515
Vista Community ClinicVistaCalif.$11,473,212
Charter Oak Health Center Inc.HartfordConn.$10,000,000
Community Health Services Inc.HartfordConn.$6,160,675
Unity Health Care Inc.WashingtonD.C.$12,000,000
Suncoast Community Health Centers Inc.RiverviewFla.$3,767,091
Project Health Inc.SumtervilleFla.$5,222,774
Tampa Family Health Centers Inc.TampaFla.$2,903,145
Palmetto Health Council Inc.AtlantaGa.$6,317,838
Southwest Georgia Health Care Inc.RichlandGa.$1,208,700
Kokua Kalihi Valley Comprehensive Family ServicesHonoluluHawaii$1,500,000
Lawndale Christian Health CenterChicagoIll.$10,000,000
Greater Elgin Family Care CenterElginIll.$2,452,172
PCC Community Wellness CenterOak ParkIll.$4,053,042
Crusaders Central Clinic AssociationRockfordIll.$5,342,337
Healthnet Inc.IndianapolisInd.$10,426,357
Primary Health Care Inc.Des MoinesIowa$2,615,429
Bucksport Regional Health CenterBucksportMaine$2,459,420
Sacopee Valley Health CenterParsonsfieldMaine$802,951
Choptank Community Health System Inc.DentonMd.$1,085,542
Dorchester House Multi-Service CenterDorchesterMass.$7,024,029
East Boston Neighborhood Health CenterEast BostonMass.$12,000,000
Healthfirst Family Care Center Inc.Fall RiverMass.$12,000,000
Community Health Connections Inc.FitchburgMass.$10,732,754
Lowell Community Health CenterLowellMass.$9,351,067
Mattapan Community Health CenterMattapanMass.$11,550,000
Greater New Bedford Community Health CenterNew BedfordMass.$5,331,145
Whittier Street Health Committee Inc.RoxburyMass.$12,000,000
Baldwin Family Health Care IncBaldwinMich.$3,000,000
Intercare Community Health NetworkBangorMich.$8,500,000
Cedar Riverside Peoples CenterMinneapolisMinn.$2,113,595
Central Mississippi Civic ImprovementJacksonMiss.$3,881,043
Nevada Rural Health Centers Inc.Carson CityNev.$11,253,351
Avis Goodwin Community Health CenterDoverN.H.$4,957,300
Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc.LittletonN.H.$2,641,157
Lamprey Health CareNewmarketN.H.$2,150,250
Zufall Health Center Inc.DoverN.J.$3,920,442
Ocean Health Initiatives Inc.LakewoodN.J.$4,753,399
Newark City Health and Human ServicesNewarkN.J.$4,996,563
Newark Community Health Centers Inc.NewarkN.J.$6,453,000
La Familia Medical CenterSanta FeN.M.$1,216,338
Montefiore Medical CenterBronxN.Y.$795,000
Urban Health Plan Inc.BronxN.Y.$12,000,000
Family Health Network of Central New York Inc.CortlandN.Y.$1,400,387
Community Healthcare NetworkNew YorkN.Y.$1,365,788
Family Healthcare CenterFargoN.D.$6,666,583
Capital Park Family Health CenterColumbusOhio$4,417,688
Muskingum Valley Health Centers Inc.McConnelsvilleOhio$5,997,980
Butler County Community Health Consortium Inc.MiddletownOhio$4,669,197
Healthsource of Ohio Inc.MilfordOhio$9,764,690
Great Salt Plains Health Center Inc.CherokeeOkla.$2,828,647
Oklahoma Community Health Services Inc.Oklahoma CityOkla.$11,985,000
Central City ConcernPortlandOre.$8,950,000
Cornerstone CareBurgettstownPa.$2,574,643
Keystone Rural Health CenterChambersburgPa.$11,515,000
Southeast Lancaster Health ServicesLancasterPa.$3,250,000
Esperanza Health CenterPhiladelphiaPa.$6,552,799
Greater Philadelphia Health Action Inc.PhiladelphiaPa.$3,937,796
Squirrel Hill Health CenterPittsburghPa.$792,700
Salud Integral En La Montana Inc.NaranjitoP.R.$8,752,140
Rincon Rural Health Initiative Project IncRinconP.R$5,915,227
Little River Medical Center Inc.Little RiverS.C.$5,523,205
Beaufort-Jasper Comprehensive Health Services Inc.RidgelandS.C.$7,912,493
Brownsville Community Health CenterBrownsvilleTexas$7,500,000
Project Vida Health CenterEl PasoTexas$6,000,422
Su Clinica FamiliarHarlingenTexas$7,500,000
El Centro Del Barrio Inc.San AntonioTexas$11,051,134
Heart of Texas Community Health Center Inc.WacoTexas$5,296,239
Blue Ridge Medical Center Inc.ArringtonVa.$5,000,000
Community Health Center of Burlington Inc.BurlingtonVt.$10,964,476
La Clinica/South Columbia Rural HealthPascoWash.$7,425,870
Total:  $508,549,051

FACT SHEET

Community Health Centers and the Recovery Act

Health centers deliver preventive and primary care services at more than 7,500 service delivery sites around the country to patients regardless of their ability to pay; charges for services are set according to income.  Health centers serve more than 17 million patients, about 38 percent of whom have no health insurance.

Three sets of health center awards have already been funded through Recovery Act appropriations on the following dates:

  • On March 2, President Obama announced grants worth $155 million to establish 126 new health center sites.  Those grants will provide access to essential preventive and primary health care for more than 750,000 people in 39 states and two territories.
  • On March 27, HHS also awarded $338 Million in Increased Demand for Services grants for health centers. Health centers are using these funds to provide care to more than 2 million additional patients over the next two years, including approximately 1 million uninsured people. In addition, over the next two years, health centers will use the funds to create and retain approximately 6,400 health center jobs.
  • On June 29, First Lady Michelle Obama announced the release of $851 million in Recovery Act grants to upgrade over 1,500 health center sites and open their doors to more patients.  More than 650 centers will use the funds for health information technology (HIT) systems, and nearly 400 health centers will adopt and expand the use of electronic health records.

The Facility Investment Program awards announced today are the fourth set of health center grants provided through the Recovery Act.

Facility Investment Program (FIP) Grants

The Obama Administration announced $508.5 million awarded in Facility Investment Program grants to community health centers nationwide to address the pressing needs of health center facilities and expanded their capacities to serve an additional 500,000 patients.  The funds were made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act).  The Facility Investment Program (FIP) grants support major construction and renovation at our nation’s health centers.  These funds will help health centers build new facilities, modernize current sites and create employment opportunities in underserved communities.

Recipients of FIP funds are expected to commit grant funds and complete the proposed projects within two years. The grants will cover two types of projects:

1. Alteration/renovation: This project type includes work required to modernize, improve or change the interior arrangements or other physical characteristics of an existing facility, and purchase/install equipment. Alterations and renovations make existing space usable for another purpose. This type of project does not increase square footage.

2. Construction (new site or expansion of existing site): This project type includes—(i) adding a new structure to an existing site that increases the total square footage of the facility; and (ii) permanently affixing structure (e.g., modular units, prefabricated buildings) to real property (i.e., land).

FIP grants, along with the entire health center program, are administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Health Center Controlled Networks (HCCN)

The Obama Administration announced the availability of $88 million in grants to help networks of health centers adopt Electronic Health Records (EHR) and other Health Information Technology (HIT) systems.  The funds are part of the $1.5 billion allotted to the Health Resources and Services Administration, a component of the Department of Health and Human Services, by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) for construction, renovation, equipment, and the acquisition of HIT systems for health center programs.

The Health Center Controlled Networks (HCCN) grant program was developed in 1994 to support the creation, development, and operation of electronic networks, controlled by groups of collaborating health centers, to improve health center operations. The networks are controlled by and operate on behalf of HRSA-supported health centers.  Each network comprises at least three collaborating organizations.

HCCNs integrate core business functions among their individual health center members, who may be anywhere in the country, but are often in the same state or region.  The core business functions these networks share are: administrative, clinical, managed care, fiscal, or health information systems.

Networks provide these functions at or below marketplace cost to their members.  In launching a network, members assess their respective environments and existing infrastructure to determine the most appropriate mix of business functions to share.  The networks seek to:

  • increase access for the low-income, uninsured population they predominantly serve;
  • enhanced the efficiency of their operations; or
  • create a higher level of performance and value.

Networks that receive HCCN funds are given great flexibility in determining their activities.  Each network is unique, depending on its state or regional environment, marketplace, collaborators, needs and interests.

HRSA awarded $36 million in grants to support the operations of 53 Health Center Controlled Networks in fiscal year 2009.

Medicare Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration Initiative

Today, President Obama directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to implement a demonstration initiative to support federal qualified health centers in delivering advanced primary care to Medicare beneficiaries.  HHS’ agencies, Health Resources and Services Administration and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, will work together to conduct this 3-year demonstration and anticipate that 500 federally qualified health centers will participate.

Advanced Primary Care Model

The Advanced Primary Care model, also known as the patient-centered medical home, promotes targeted, accessible, continuous, and coordinated family-centered care.  The demonstration is designed to evaluate the impact of the advanced primary care practice model on access, quality and cost of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries served by federal qualified health centers.

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC)

FQHCs provide comprehensive primary and preventive health care for medically underserved populations who face the greatest economic and geographic barriers to accessing care.  Overseen by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the Health Center program is a national network of more than 1,100 community, migrant, homeless and public housing health center grantees. These organizations provide health care at more than 7,500 clinical sites, ranging from large medical facilities to mobile vans.  In 2008, health centers served more than 17 million medically underserved people.  FQHCs provide an environment to demonstrate the benefits of medical homes can offer to Medicare beneficiaries.

New Medicare Demonstration

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and HRSA will develop the demonstration, which would include a solicitation of applications from FQHC grantees.  To participate, FQHC grantees will need to demonstrate that their clinic sites have the capacity to deliver continuous and coordinated care across providers and settings, including improving access to care by expanding service hours, facilitating and following up on referrals, and managing medications prescribed by different physicians.   FQHC clinic sites selected to participate in the demonstration will receive a monthly care management fee for each Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary they enroll into the demonstration, in addition to payment for any other covered Medicare services they provide.

Research Design

This demonstration will evaluate whether federal qualified health centers that deliver advanced primary care improve access and quality, promote appropriate use of services, and reduce health care costs.  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will begin soliciting applications in spring 2010, aiming to begin implementation of the 3-year demonstration initiative in January 2011.  CMS will conduct an independent evaluation of this demonstration.

** This release has been corrected.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

CMS CHIPRA Dental State Health Official Letter

October 7th, 2009

CMS Issues State Letter for Dental Coverage in CHIP

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12
Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Center for Medicaid and State Operations
SHO #09-012
CHIPRA # 7
October 7, 2009

RE: Dental Coverage in CHIP

Dear State Health Official (full letter on the CMS site):
The Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA), Public Law 111-3, reauthorizes the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) under title XXI of the Social Security Act (the Act). CHIPRA ensures that States are able to continue their existing CHIP programs and provides funding to expand health insurance coverage to additional low-income uninsured children including children already eligible for CHIP or Medicaid but not enrolled. The purpose of this letter is to provide general guidance on some of the provisions in section 501 of CHIPRA, including the dental benefit provisions and the State option to provide dental-only supplemental coverage, pending the issuance of regulations.

Required Dental Services

Section 2103(c)(5) of the Act, as added by section 501 of CHIPRA, requires that “child health assistance provided to a targeted low-income child shall include coverage of dental services necessary to prevent disease and promote oral health, restore oral structures to health and function, and treat emergency conditions.” This requirement applies to all child health assistance coverage described in section 2103 and is effective October 1, 2009.

Medicaid Expansions

States that provide title XXI coverage to children through a Medicaid expansion program are required to provide Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) services, as defined in section 1905(r) of the Act. The dental services provided under a Medicaid expansion program through EPSDT will be considered to meet the requirements of this provision.

Separate CHIP Programs

States that provide coverage in a separate CHIP program may choose between two methods of providing the dental services as required by section 2103(c)(5) of the Act. The State may define the services in the dental benefit package and demonstrate that the package includes all of the services required by the statute. In so doing, the State should specify the periodicity schedule with which preventative and restorative services, such as cleanings and fillings, would be provided, as well as whether these services are sufficient to prevent further disease, as required by section 2103(c)(5). This applies to State-defined benefit packages and dental benchmark packages as described below.
Alternatively, the State may provide a dental benefit package that is equivalent to one of the three dental benchmark packages described in the CHIPRA statute. Under the statute, there is no option in new section 2103(c)(5) of the Act for proving actuarial equivalence or modifying the benefit package. States may, however, cover benefits in addition to the dental benchmark plan consistent with the standards in section 2103(c)(5).

In order to fully describe a State dental benefit package under a separate CHIP program, and ensure that the benefits are sufficient to meet the statutory requirements, a State should describe both the types of covered benefits and the covered amount or duration of those benefits. The amount or duration should also be expressed through identification of the periodicity schedule that the State will use in its program. The periodicity schedule sets the frequency by which certain services should be provided and will be covered. We encourage States to rely on nationally recognized standards, including Medicaid dental periodicity guidelines used for children under EPSDT or the guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). The link to AAPD’s periodicity guidelines can be found at: http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/G_Periodicity.pdf.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

Secretary Sebelius Awards $40 Million to States to Find, Enroll Children in CHIP, Medicaid

October 1st, 2009

Secretary Sebelius Awards $40 Million in Grants for Either Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today announced $40 million in grants to 69 grantees in 41 states and the District of Columbia to help them find and enroll children who are uninsured but eligible for either Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

“Today’s awards will help fulfill President Obama’s pledge to assure the health and well-being of our nation’s children,” said Secretary Sebelius.  “With millions of Americans either out of work or otherwise struggling to make ends meet during this recession, there is an even greater urgency to bring steady, reliable health care to children in these families who may have lost their coverage.”

Recognizing that millions of children are eligible for Medicaid or CHIP, but are therefore needlessly uninsured, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) set aside $100 million for fiscal years 2009-2013 expressly to help find and enroll eligible children.  Of the total outreach amount, $80 million will be given to states and other organizations, $10 million to Tribal organizations and $10 million for a national outreach effort. Today’s awards are for a two year period ending Dec. 31, 2011, which will then be followed by a second round of $40 million in new grants.

As called for in CHIPRA, grants were awarded to applicants whose outreach, enrollment and retention efforts will target geographic areas with high rates of eligible but uninsured children, particularly those with racial and ethnic minority groups who are uninsured at higher-than-average rates.  For example, 20 percent of the projects to be funded will target Hispanic children, with an emphasis on Hispanic teens, and 11 percent will focus on homeless children and seven percent will be aimed at Native American/Alaska Native children.

The vast majority of grantees will be using multiple, community-based approaches. One grantee in Missouri, for example, will work with a consortium of 35 churches in low-income, minority communities.  Those parishioners will go door-to-door to locate potentially eligible children and then help those families apply for CHIP or Medicaid coverage.  Another grantee will place self-service kiosks in community centers and Native American Chapter Houses (community halls) where there will also be staff available to help with applications if needed.  One state school system will track children who receive free or reduced cost lunches and, with the families’ permission, share that information with state health programs, which will, in turn, mail applications for CHIP and Medicaid to those families.  The state will also provide one-on-one-assistance with those applications.

The grant awards require that recipients be able to show actual increases in enrollment and retention of children already in the programs.  Both CHIP and Medicaid state agencies are to report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) the number of new enrollees and those who retained coverage that are directly attributable to the grant activities.  Grantees are also to report activities they believe were the most effective in finding, enrolling and maintaining children in these benefit programs.

“No child in America should go without decent health care,” said Cindy Mann, director of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations — the group within CMS that will administer the grants. “With the funds we are awarding today we hope to reduce the number of children who do.”

A list of grantees by state is below.

State

Grantee

Award

Arizona

Pima Community Access Program

$982,577

Alabama

Alabama Primary Care Association

$987,732

Tombigbee Healthcare Authority

$141,167

Alaska

Alaska Youth and Family Network

$198,304

Norton Sound Health Corporation

$72,999

Arkansas

St. Francis House NWA Inc., Community Clinic

$162,965

California

Providence Little Company of Mary Foundation

$317,144

Yolo County Children’s Alliance (YCCA)

$399,900

Colorado

Colorado Association of School Based Health Care

$499,835

Telluride Foundation

$301,410

Connecticut

Community Health Center Association of Connecticut

$988,177

Community Health Center, Inc. (CHC)

$400,584

District of Columbia

National Alliance for Hispanic Health

$984,144

Florida

Fanm Ayisyen Nan Miyami, Inc. (FANM)

$69,102

University of South Florida

$988,177

Georgia

West End Medical Centers Inc.

$571,135

Medical College of Georgia Research Institute

$986,827

Hawaii

Bay Clinic, Inc.

$200,000

Hawaii Primary Care Association

$488,187

Illinois

Chicago Public Schools

$235,173

Beacon Therapeutic School, Inc. of Chicago

$250,830

Idaho

Mountain States Group, Inc.

$287,896

Indiana

St. Vincent Health Inc.

$864,309

Kansas

Inter-Faith Ministries Wichita Inc.

$523,932

Keys for Networking

$866,749

Louisiana

Louisiana State Department of Health and Hospitals

$955,681

TECHE Action Board

$234,808

Maine

Maine Department of Health and Human Services

$680,249

Maine Primary Care Association

$311,061

Maryland

Garrett County Health Department

$200,000

MD Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

$988,177

Massachusetts

Health Care for All, Inc.

$410,815

South End Community Health Center

$304,385

Michigan

Michigan Primary Care Association

$915,079

YMCA of Greater Grand Rapids

$293,040

Minnesota

Portico Healthnet, Inc.

$988,177

Vietnamese Social Services of Minnesota

$280,000

Mississippi

Mississippi Primary Health Care Association

$988,152

Missouri

Missouri Coalition for Primary Health Care

$332,173

St. Louis Children’s Hospital Foundation

$985,373

Montana

Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services

$971,868

Nebraska

One World Community Health Centers Inc.

$706,264

New Hampshire

Cheshire Medical Center

$143,700

New Jersey

Health Research and Educational Trust of New Jersey

$988,177

New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services

$988,177

New Mexico

First Nations Community Health Source

$355,000

New Mexico Human Services Department

$957,221

New York

The Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital

$498,718

Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation

$988,177

North Carolina

North Carolina Pediatric Society Foundation

$678,210

Ohio

Dayton Public Schools

$327,900

Legal Aid Society of Greater Cincinnati

$316,418

Oklahoma

Oklahoma Health Care Authority

$988,177

Oregon

Oregon Department of Health and Human Services

$988,177

Northeast Oregon Network of LaGrande

$465,982

Pennsylvania

Concern for Health Options, Information, Care & Education (CHOICE)

$200,000

Consumer Health Coalition

$299,750

South Carolina

Palmetto Project, Inc.

$981,009

Texas

Texas Leadership Center

$988,177

YWCA of Lubbock, TX, INC.

$384,680

Utah

Association for Utah Community Health

$762,580

Virginia

Catholic Charities USA (CCUSA)

$957,617

Virginia Health Care Foundation

$988,154

Washington

HIP of Spokane County/Community Minded Enterprise (CME)

$299,766

Puget Sound Neighborhood Health Centers Neighborcare

$150,000

West Virginia

West Virginia Alliance for Sustainable Families

$330,700

Wyoming

Wind River Health Systems Inc.

$381,895

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Department of Health Services

$988,177

Wyoming

Wyoming Department of Health

$268,889

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

“Meaningful” Progress Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange

October 1st, 2009

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

I recently reported on our announcement of State Health Information Technology Grants and grants to establish Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers, as authorized under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).

Today I want to discuss the important term “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHRs) – both as a concept that underlies the movement toward an electronic health care environment and as a practical set of standards that will be issued as a proposed regulation by the end of 2009.

The HITECH Act provisions of the Recovery Act create a truly historic opportunity to transform our health system through unprecedented investments in the development of a nationwide electronic health information system.  This system will ultimately help facilitate, inform, measure, and sustain improvements in the quality, efficiency, and safety of health care available to every American.  Simply put, health professionals will be able to give better care, and their patients’ experience of care will improve, leading to better health outcomes overall.

As many of you are aware, the HITECH Act provides incentive payments to doctors and hospitals that adopt and meaningfully use health information technology.  Eligible physicians, including those in solo or small practices, can receive up to $44,000 over five years under Medicare or $63,750 over six years under Medicaid for being meaningful users of certified electronic health records.  Hospitals that become meaningful EHR users could receive up to four years of financial incentive payments under Medicare beginning in 2011, and up to six years of incentive payments under Medicaid beginning in October 2010.

The HITECH Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help those who want to improve their care delivery, and will serve as a catalyst to accelerate and smooth the path to HIT adoption by more individual providers and organizations.  The dollars are tangible evidence of a national determination to bring health care into the 21st century.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is charged with coordinating nationwide efforts to implement and use the most advanced health information technology and the electronic exchange of health information. ONC is working with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), through an open and transparent process, on efforts to officially designate what constitutes “meaningful use.”

ONC has already engaged in a broad range of efforts to support the development of a formal definition of meaningful use.  The HITECH Act designated a federal advisory committee, the HIT Policy Committee, with broad representation from major health care constituencies, to provide recommendations to ONC on meaningful use.  The HIT Policy Committee has provided two sets of recommendations, informed by input from a variety of stakeholders.  ONC and CMS have also conducted a series of listening sessions to solicit feedback from more than 200 representatives of various constituent groups and an open comment period where over 800 public comments were submitted and reviewed.  The second set of recommendations on meaningful use was issued at a July 16 HIT Policy Committee meeting and details can be found at healthit.hhs.gov/policycommittee.

CMS is expected to publish a formal definition of meaningful use, for the purposes of receiving the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, by December 31, 2009. At that time, the public will be able to comment on the definition, and such comments will be considered in reaching any final definition of the term.

By focusing on “meaningful use,” we recognize that better health care does not come solely from the adoption of technology itself, but through the exchange and use of health information to best inform clinical decisions at the point of care.  Meaningful use of EHRs, we anticipate, will also enable providers to reduce the amount of time spent on duplicative paperwork and gain more time to spend with their patients throughout the day.  It will lead us toward improvements and sustainability of our health care system that can only be attained with the help of a reliable and secure nationwide electronic health information system.

The concept of meaningful use is simple and inspiring, but we recognize that it becomes significantly more complex at a policy and regulatory level.  As a result, we expect that any formal definition of “meaningful use” must include specific activities health care providers need to undertake to qualify for incentives from the federal government.

Ultimately, we believe “meaningful use” should embody the goals of a transformed health system.  Meaningful use, in the long-term, is when EHRs are used by health care providers to improve patient care, safety, and quality.

What’s next?

As stated above, the next step in our process is a notice of proposed rulemaking in late 2009 with a public comment period in early 2010.  As this process unfolds, we will continue to talk and share experiences about transitioning to EHRs, and to help deepen understanding among physicians and hospitals about the use of EHRs.  We will also present programs designed to help smooth the transition process, and identify activities physicians and hospitals can engage in now to promote adoption of EHRs.  As efforts advance, we will turn our attention to other necessary supporting programs, some of which you will hear more about in the coming weeks, including defining what constitutes a “certified” EHR, which is one of the requirements to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

In the meantime, what can providers do to move toward becoming “meaningful users” – even in the absence of a formal definition?  Naturally, while understanding that the final definition will be adopted through a formal rulemaking process, it will be helpful to be as familiar as possible with the discussion of meaningful use criteria to date.  (You will find that information posted at healthit.hhs.gov/meaningfuluse.)

Armed with an understanding of the discussion of meaningful use as it unfolds, providers can begin to consider how their own practices or organizations might be reshaped to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through the use of an electronic health record system.  Be assured you will not be alone as you seek to adopt an EHR system.  Through our recently announced collaborative HITECH grants programs and others to be initiated later this year, we will continue to support providers in moving forward.  Additional details about the grants are also available in my previous update and at healthit.hhs.gov/HITECHgrants.

To some providers, particularly small or already stretched physician practices or small, rural hospitals, the path toward meaningful use may still seem arduous.  To others, who would just prefer to stick with the “status quo,” it may seem like an unwanted intrusion.  We believe that the time has come for coordinated action.  The price of inaction – in adverse events, lost patient lives, delayed or improper treatments, unnecessary procedures, excessive costs, and so on – is just too high, and will only get worse.

There is much at stake and much to do.  We must relieve the crushing burden of health care costs in this country by improving efficiency, and assuring the highest level of patient care and safety regardless of geography or demographics.  By using current technologies in a meaningful way, as well as technology to be developed in the future, we will take great strides toward solving some of the most vexing problems facing our health care system and creating a new platform for innovative solutions to health care.

I look forward to providing periodic updates, and to continued interactions with all the communities that have so much to gain from this profound transformation.

Sincerely,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare

About RECs

August 11th, 2009

Please send any questions to info@regionalextensioncenters.com

Thank you.

TwitterLinkedInFacebookShare
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin