Archive for the ‘Grants’ category

HHS Awards $144 Million for Higher Education and Research

April 11th, 2010

Academia and the Research Community Will Support Health Providers

Awards totaling $84 million to 16 universities and junior colleges will support training and development of more than 50,000 new health IT professionals.

Additionally Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) awards totaling $60 million were provided to four advanced research institutions ($15 million each) to focus on solving current and future challenges that represent barriers to adoption and meaningful use of health IT.

Community College Consortia Program ($36 million):

The Community College Consortia Program provides assistance to five regional recipients to establish a multi-institutional consortium within each designated region. The five regional consortia will include 70 community colleges in total. Each college will create non-degree training programs that can be completed in six months or less by individuals with appropriate prior education and/or experience. First year grant awards are estimated at $36 million. An additional $34 million is available for year two funding of these programs after successful completion of a mid-project evaluation.

Institution Amount of Award
Bellevue College
Bellevue, Washington
$ 3,364,798
Cuyahoga Community College District
Cleveland, Ohio
$ 7,531,403
Los Rios Community College District
Sacramento, California
$ 5,435,587
Pitt Community College
Winterville, North Carolina
$10,901,009
Tidewater Community College
Norfolk, Virginia
$ 8,492,793

Curriculum Development Center ($10 million):

The Curriculum Development Centers will develop educational materials for key health IT topics to be used by the members of the Community College Consortia program. The materials will also be made available to institutions of higher education across the country. One of the centers will receive additional assistance to act as the National Training and Dissemination Center (NTDC) for the curriculum materials.

Institution Amount of Award
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama
$1,820,000
The Trustees of Columbia University
New York City, New York
$1,820,000
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina
$1,820,000
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland
$1,820,000
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon
$2,720,000*

*(Will also receive the NTDC awards)

University-Based Training Programs ($32 million):

The University-based training programs will produce trained professionals for vital, highly specialized health IT roles. Most trainees in these programs will complete intensive courses of study in 12-months or less and receive a university-issued certificate of advanced training.  Other trainees supported by these grants will study toward masters’ degrees.

Institution Amount of Award
The Trustees of Columbia University
New York City, New York
$3,786,677
University of Colorado Denver College of Nursing
Denver, Colorado
$2,622,186
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina
$2,167,121
George Washington University
District of Columbia
$4,612,313
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana
$1,406,469
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland
$3,752,512
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota
$5,145,705
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon
$3,085,812
Texas State University
San Marcos, Texas
$5,421,205

Competency Examination Program ($6 million):

This program will support the development and initial administration of a set of health IT competency examinations. The program will create an objective measure to assess basic competency for individuals trained in short-term, non degree health IT programs and for members of the workforce seeking to demonstrate their competency in certain health IT workforce roles.

Institution Amount of Award
Northern Virginia Community College
Annandale, Virginia
$6,000,000

Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Program ($60 million):

The SHARP program recognizes the critical importance of research to support improvements in the quality, safety, and efficiency of healthcare by creating “breakthrough” advances in information technology. The SHARP program targets four areas where improvements in technology are needed. The four SHARP award recipients, their areas of research focus and funding are:

  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Ill. – Security of Health Information Technology – Developing security and risk mitigation policies and the technologies necessary to build and preserve the public trust as Health IT systems gain widespread use. $15 million.
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas – Patient-Centered Cognitive Support – Harnessing the power of Health IT so that it integrates with, enhances and supports clinicians’ reasoning and decision-making. $15 million.
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College, Boston, Mass. – Healthcare Application and Network Platform Architectures – Developing new and improved architectures that will leverage benefits of today’s architecture and focus on the flexibility and scalability needs for the future to address significant increases in capture, storage and analysis of data. $15 million.
  • Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. – Secondary Use of EHR Data– Strategies to make use of data that will be stored in EHRs for improving the overall quality of health care, while maintaining data privacy and security. $15 million.

Information about the HITECH awards available through the workforce development program is available at http://HealthIT.HHS.gov/ and www.grants.gov.

Health IT Regional Extension Centers

Health IT for Regional Extension Centers

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

State HIE, REC and Job Training Grant Recipients

February 12th, 2010

State HIE, REC and Job Training Grant Recipients for Health IT, Training Workers for Health Jobs of the Future

A complete listing of the state HIE, REC and job training grant recipients is as follows:

State HIE Awards:

State HIE Awardee Award Amount
Alabama Medicaid Agency $10,564,789
Arizona Governor’s Office of Economic Recovery $9,377,000
Arkansas Dept of Finance and Administration $7,909,401
California Health and Human Services Agency $38,752,536
Colorado Regional Health Information Organization $9,175,777
Delaware Health Information Network $4,680,284
Government of the District of Columbia $5,189,709
Georgia Department of Community Health $13,003,003
Office of the Governor (Guam) $1,600,000
The Hawaii Health Information Exchange $5,602,318
Illinois Department of Health care and Family Services $18,837,639
Kansas Health Information Exchange Project $9,010,066
Cabinet for Health and Family Services (Kentucky) $9,750,000
State of Maine/Governor’s Office of Health Policy & Finance $6,599,401
Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation $10,599,719
Michigan Department of Health $14,993,085
Minnesota Department of Health $9,622,000
Missouri Depart of Social Services $13,765,040
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services $6,133,426
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services $5,457,856
Lovelace Clinic Foundation, New Mexico $7,070,441
New York eHealth Collaborative Inc. $22,364,782
Commonwealth of the NMI, Department of Public Health $800,000
North Carolina Department of State Treasurer $12,950,860
Ohio Health Information Partnership LLC $14,872,199
Oklahoma Health Care Authority $8,883,741
Pacific Ecommerce Development Corporation (American Samoa) $600,000
State of Oregon $8,579,992
Governor’s Office of Health Care Reform Commonwealth of Pennsylvania $17,140,446
Oticina del Gobernador La Fortaeza (Puerto Rico) $7,770,980
Rhode Island Quality Institute $5,280,000
State of Tennessee $11,664,580
Utah Department of Health $6,296,705
Vermont Department of Human Services $5,034,328
Virgin Islands Department of Health $1,000,000
Virginia Department of Health $11,613,537
Health Care Authority (Washington) $11,300,000
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources $7,819,000
Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services $9,441,000
Office of the Governor (Wyoming) $4,873,000
Total Award Amount $385,978,640

Regional Extension Center Awards:

RECs Awardee Award Amount
Altarum Institute, Michigan $19,619,990
Arkansas Foundation For Medical Care $7,400,000
CIMRO of Nebraska $6,647,371
Colorado RHIO $12,475,000
District of Columbia Primary Care Association $5,488,437
Fund for Public Health New York $21,754,010
Greater Cincinnati HealthBridge (Ohio-Kentucky) $9,738,000
Health Choice Network, Inc.,Florida $8,500,000
HealthInsight, Utah-Nevada $6,917,783
Iowa IFMC $5,508,019
Kansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc. $7,000,000
Key Health Alliance (Stratis Health), Minnesota – North Dakota $19,000,000
Lovelace Clinic, New Mexico $6,175,000
Massachusetts Technology Park Cooperation $13,433,107
MetaStar, Inc, Wisconsin $9,125,000
Morehouse School of Medicine, Inc., Georgia $19,521,542
New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) $26,534,999
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill $13,569,169
Northern California Regional Extension Center $17,286,081
Northern Illinois University $7,546,000
Northwestern University $7,649,533
OCHIN Inc. (Primary), Oregon $13,201,499
Ohio Health Information Partnership $28,500,000
Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality, Inc. $5,331,685
Purdue University $12,000,000
Qsource (Tennessee) $7,256,155
Qualis Health, Washington – Idaho $12,846,482
Rhode Island Quality Institute $6,000,000
Southern California Regional Extension Center $13,961,339
Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. $6,762,080
VHQC and the Center for Innovative Technology, for The Virginia Consortium $12,425,000
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc. $6,000,000
Total Award Amount $375,173,281

Job Training Awards:

Healthcare / High Growth Grant Recipient Award Amount
Calhoun Community College $3,470,830
Mid-South Community College $3,391,053
South Arkansas Community College $3,520,612
Kern Community College District (KCCD) $2,768,572
Los Rios Community College District $4,988,561
Mt. San Antonio Community College District $2,239,714
San Diego State University Research Foundation $4,953,575
San Jose State University Research Foundation $5,000,000
San Bernardino Community College District $4,260,863
Youth Policy Institute $3,623,473
Spanish Speaking Unity Council $3,559,139
Otero Junior College $4,999,350
National Council of La Raza $3,457,516
Providence Health Foundation of Providence Hospital $4,953,999
DeKalb Technical College (DTC) $2,043,859
Governors State University $4,994,686
Indianapolis Private Industry Council, Inc. $4,885,812
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana $5,000,000
Iowa Workforce Development $3,403,164
Maysville Community and Technical College $2,007,637
Louisiana Technical College, Greater Acadiana Region 4 $4,859,040
Southern University at Shreveport $4,296,308
Maine Department of Labor $4,892,213
The Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) $4,928,654
Macomb Community College $4,971,642
American Indian Opportunities Industrialization Center $5,000,000
Northland Community and Technical College $4,996,844
MN State Colleges & Universities DBA Pine Technical College $4,230,950
South Central College $4,506,101
The Montgomery Institute $4,519,625
Full Employment Council $4,998,344
Crowder College $3,576,760
Maryville University – St. Louis $4,699,354
University of New Hampshire $2,944,732
Passaic County Community College $4,475,041
Fulton Montgomery Community College (FMCC) $2,865,657
Hudson Valley Community College (HVCC) $3,382,200
University Behavioral Associates, Inc. $5,000,000
Workforce Investment Board of Herkimer, Madison, and Oneida Counties $2,700,096
Goodwill Industries, Inc., Serving E. Neb and SW Iowa $2,007,846
Nevada Cancer Institute $3,262,676
Berea Children’s Home $4,927,843
BioOhio $5,000,000
Cincinnati State Technical and Community College $4,935,132
Columbus State Community College $4,605,303
Enterprise for Employment and Education $2,373,073
Trident Technical College $2,624,532
Florence-Darlington Technical College (FDTC) $4,346,351
The University of South Dakota $5,000,000
Centerstone of Tennessee, Inc. $5,000,000
North Central Texas College $4,150,005
San Jacinto Community College District $4,722,919
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB) $4,655,799
Shenandoah Valley Workforce Investment Board, Inc. (SVWIB) $4,951,991
Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board $5,000,000
Total $226,929,446

Additional information about the state HIE and RECs may be found at http://HealthIT.HHS.gov/statehie and http://healthit.hhs.gov/extensionprogram

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program

February 12th, 2010

State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program Awards

Early 2010 marked the first announcement of awards to 40 states and State Designated Entities (SDE) under HITECH’s State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program. This Program funds states’ efforts to rapidly build capacity for exchanging health information across the health care system both within and across states. Awardees are responsible for increasing connectivity and enabling patient-centric information flow to improve the quality and efficiency of care. Key to this is the continual evolution and advancement of necessary governance, policies, technical services, business operations, and financing mechanisms for HIE over each State and SDE’s four-year performance period. This Program is building on existing efforts to advance regional and state level health information exchange while moving toward nationwide interoperability.

Over the next several weeks the remaining cooperative agreements will be awarded to approved applicants; these awardees will join the 40 awardees announced today in advancing mechanisms for health information sharing in their states and across the country.

State grantees in the first series of awards:

  • Rhode Island Quality Institute
  • State of Oregon
  • Georgia Department of Community Health
  • Kansas Health Information Exchange Project
  • Cabinet for Health and Family Services (KY)
  • Missouri Depart of Social Services
  • Colorado Regional Health Information Organization
  • Health Care Authority (Washington)
  • Governor’s Office of Health Care Reform Commonwealth of PA
  • Virginia Department of Health
  • State of Maine/Governor’s Office of Health Policy & Finance
  • The Hawaii Health Information Exchange
  • Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
  • Government of the District of Columbia
  • Minnesota Department of Health
  • Virgin Islands Department of Health
  • Oticina del Gobernador La Fortaeza (PR)
  • Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
  • New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
  • Alabama Medicaid Agency
  • California Health and Human Services Agency
  • Utah Department of Health
  • Vermont Department of Human Services
  • Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation
  • Lovelace Clinic Foundation (New Mexico)
  • State of Tennessee
  • North Carolina Department of State Treasurer
  • West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
  • Arkansas Dept of Finance and Administration
  • Delaware Health Information Network
  • Michigan Department of Health
  • New York eHealth Collaborative, Inc.
  • Oklahoma Health Care Authority
  • Pacific Ecommerce Development Corporation (American Samoa)
  • Ohio Health Information Partnership, LLC
  • Arizona Governor’s Office of Economic Recovery
  • Nevada Department of Health and Human Services
  • Office of the Governor (Guam)
  • Commonwealth of the NMI, Department of Public Health
  • Office of the Governor (WY)
Information & Resources
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

Secretary Sebelius Awards $40 Million to States to Find, Enroll Children in CHIP, Medicaid

October 1st, 2009

Secretary Sebelius Awards $40 Million in Grants for Either Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today announced $40 million in grants to 69 grantees in 41 states and the District of Columbia to help them find and enroll children who are uninsured but eligible for either Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

“Today’s awards will help fulfill President Obama’s pledge to assure the health and well-being of our nation’s children,” said Secretary Sebelius.  “With millions of Americans either out of work or otherwise struggling to make ends meet during this recession, there is an even greater urgency to bring steady, reliable health care to children in these families who may have lost their coverage.”

Recognizing that millions of children are eligible for Medicaid or CHIP, but are therefore needlessly uninsured, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) set aside $100 million for fiscal years 2009-2013 expressly to help find and enroll eligible children.  Of the total outreach amount, $80 million will be given to states and other organizations, $10 million to Tribal organizations and $10 million for a national outreach effort. Today’s awards are for a two year period ending Dec. 31, 2011, which will then be followed by a second round of $40 million in new grants.

As called for in CHIPRA, grants were awarded to applicants whose outreach, enrollment and retention efforts will target geographic areas with high rates of eligible but uninsured children, particularly those with racial and ethnic minority groups who are uninsured at higher-than-average rates.  For example, 20 percent of the projects to be funded will target Hispanic children, with an emphasis on Hispanic teens, and 11 percent will focus on homeless children and seven percent will be aimed at Native American/Alaska Native children.

The vast majority of grantees will be using multiple, community-based approaches. One grantee in Missouri, for example, will work with a consortium of 35 churches in low-income, minority communities.  Those parishioners will go door-to-door to locate potentially eligible children and then help those families apply for CHIP or Medicaid coverage.  Another grantee will place self-service kiosks in community centers and Native American Chapter Houses (community halls) where there will also be staff available to help with applications if needed.  One state school system will track children who receive free or reduced cost lunches and, with the families’ permission, share that information with state health programs, which will, in turn, mail applications for CHIP and Medicaid to those families.  The state will also provide one-on-one-assistance with those applications.

The grant awards require that recipients be able to show actual increases in enrollment and retention of children already in the programs.  Both CHIP and Medicaid state agencies are to report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) the number of new enrollees and those who retained coverage that are directly attributable to the grant activities.  Grantees are also to report activities they believe were the most effective in finding, enrolling and maintaining children in these benefit programs.

“No child in America should go without decent health care,” said Cindy Mann, director of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations — the group within CMS that will administer the grants. “With the funds we are awarding today we hope to reduce the number of children who do.”

A list of grantees by state is below.

State

Grantee

Award

Arizona

Pima Community Access Program

$982,577

Alabama

Alabama Primary Care Association

$987,732

Tombigbee Healthcare Authority

$141,167

Alaska

Alaska Youth and Family Network

$198,304

Norton Sound Health Corporation

$72,999

Arkansas

St. Francis House NWA Inc., Community Clinic

$162,965

California

Providence Little Company of Mary Foundation

$317,144

Yolo County Children’s Alliance (YCCA)

$399,900

Colorado

Colorado Association of School Based Health Care

$499,835

Telluride Foundation

$301,410

Connecticut

Community Health Center Association of Connecticut

$988,177

Community Health Center, Inc. (CHC)

$400,584

District of Columbia

National Alliance for Hispanic Health

$984,144

Florida

Fanm Ayisyen Nan Miyami, Inc. (FANM)

$69,102

University of South Florida

$988,177

Georgia

West End Medical Centers Inc.

$571,135

Medical College of Georgia Research Institute

$986,827

Hawaii

Bay Clinic, Inc.

$200,000

Hawaii Primary Care Association

$488,187

Illinois

Chicago Public Schools

$235,173

Beacon Therapeutic School, Inc. of Chicago

$250,830

Idaho

Mountain States Group, Inc.

$287,896

Indiana

St. Vincent Health Inc.

$864,309

Kansas

Inter-Faith Ministries Wichita Inc.

$523,932

Keys for Networking

$866,749

Louisiana

Louisiana State Department of Health and Hospitals

$955,681

TECHE Action Board

$234,808

Maine

Maine Department of Health and Human Services

$680,249

Maine Primary Care Association

$311,061

Maryland

Garrett County Health Department

$200,000

MD Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

$988,177

Massachusetts

Health Care for All, Inc.

$410,815

South End Community Health Center

$304,385

Michigan

Michigan Primary Care Association

$915,079

YMCA of Greater Grand Rapids

$293,040

Minnesota

Portico Healthnet, Inc.

$988,177

Vietnamese Social Services of Minnesota

$280,000

Mississippi

Mississippi Primary Health Care Association

$988,152

Missouri

Missouri Coalition for Primary Health Care

$332,173

St. Louis Children’s Hospital Foundation

$985,373

Montana

Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services

$971,868

Nebraska

One World Community Health Centers Inc.

$706,264

New Hampshire

Cheshire Medical Center

$143,700

New Jersey

Health Research and Educational Trust of New Jersey

$988,177

New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services

$988,177

New Mexico

First Nations Community Health Source

$355,000

New Mexico Human Services Department

$957,221

New York

The Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital

$498,718

Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation

$988,177

North Carolina

North Carolina Pediatric Society Foundation

$678,210

Ohio

Dayton Public Schools

$327,900

Legal Aid Society of Greater Cincinnati

$316,418

Oklahoma

Oklahoma Health Care Authority

$988,177

Oregon

Oregon Department of Health and Human Services

$988,177

Northeast Oregon Network of LaGrande

$465,982

Pennsylvania

Concern for Health Options, Information, Care & Education (CHOICE)

$200,000

Consumer Health Coalition

$299,750

South Carolina

Palmetto Project, Inc.

$981,009

Texas

Texas Leadership Center

$988,177

YWCA of Lubbock, TX, INC.

$384,680

Utah

Association for Utah Community Health

$762,580

Virginia

Catholic Charities USA (CCUSA)

$957,617

Virginia Health Care Foundation

$988,154

Washington

HIP of Spokane County/Community Minded Enterprise (CME)

$299,766

Puget Sound Neighborhood Health Centers Neighborcare

$150,000

West Virginia

West Virginia Alliance for Sustainable Families

$330,700

Wyoming

Wind River Health Systems Inc.

$381,895

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Department of Health Services

$988,177

Wyoming

Wyoming Department of Health

$268,889

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

“Meaningful” Progress Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange

October 1st, 2009

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

I recently reported on our announcement of State Health Information Technology Grants and grants to establish Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers, as authorized under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).

Today I want to discuss the important term “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHRs) – both as a concept that underlies the movement toward an electronic health care environment and as a practical set of standards that will be issued as a proposed regulation by the end of 2009.

The HITECH Act provisions of the Recovery Act create a truly historic opportunity to transform our health system through unprecedented investments in the development of a nationwide electronic health information system.  This system will ultimately help facilitate, inform, measure, and sustain improvements in the quality, efficiency, and safety of health care available to every American.  Simply put, health professionals will be able to give better care, and their patients’ experience of care will improve, leading to better health outcomes overall.

As many of you are aware, the HITECH Act provides incentive payments to doctors and hospitals that adopt and meaningfully use health information technology.  Eligible physicians, including those in solo or small practices, can receive up to $44,000 over five years under Medicare or $63,750 over six years under Medicaid for being meaningful users of certified electronic health records.  Hospitals that become meaningful EHR users could receive up to four years of financial incentive payments under Medicare beginning in 2011, and up to six years of incentive payments under Medicaid beginning in October 2010.

The HITECH Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help those who want to improve their care delivery, and will serve as a catalyst to accelerate and smooth the path to HIT adoption by more individual providers and organizations.  The dollars are tangible evidence of a national determination to bring health care into the 21st century.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is charged with coordinating nationwide efforts to implement and use the most advanced health information technology and the electronic exchange of health information. ONC is working with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), through an open and transparent process, on efforts to officially designate what constitutes “meaningful use.”

ONC has already engaged in a broad range of efforts to support the development of a formal definition of meaningful use.  The HITECH Act designated a federal advisory committee, the HIT Policy Committee, with broad representation from major health care constituencies, to provide recommendations to ONC on meaningful use.  The HIT Policy Committee has provided two sets of recommendations, informed by input from a variety of stakeholders.  ONC and CMS have also conducted a series of listening sessions to solicit feedback from more than 200 representatives of various constituent groups and an open comment period where over 800 public comments were submitted and reviewed.  The second set of recommendations on meaningful use was issued at a July 16 HIT Policy Committee meeting and details can be found at healthit.hhs.gov/policycommittee.

CMS is expected to publish a formal definition of meaningful use, for the purposes of receiving the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, by December 31, 2009. At that time, the public will be able to comment on the definition, and such comments will be considered in reaching any final definition of the term.

By focusing on “meaningful use,” we recognize that better health care does not come solely from the adoption of technology itself, but through the exchange and use of health information to best inform clinical decisions at the point of care.  Meaningful use of EHRs, we anticipate, will also enable providers to reduce the amount of time spent on duplicative paperwork and gain more time to spend with their patients throughout the day.  It will lead us toward improvements and sustainability of our health care system that can only be attained with the help of a reliable and secure nationwide electronic health information system.

The concept of meaningful use is simple and inspiring, but we recognize that it becomes significantly more complex at a policy and regulatory level.  As a result, we expect that any formal definition of “meaningful use” must include specific activities health care providers need to undertake to qualify for incentives from the federal government.

Ultimately, we believe “meaningful use” should embody the goals of a transformed health system.  Meaningful use, in the long-term, is when EHRs are used by health care providers to improve patient care, safety, and quality.

What’s next?

As stated above, the next step in our process is a notice of proposed rulemaking in late 2009 with a public comment period in early 2010.  As this process unfolds, we will continue to talk and share experiences about transitioning to EHRs, and to help deepen understanding among physicians and hospitals about the use of EHRs.  We will also present programs designed to help smooth the transition process, and identify activities physicians and hospitals can engage in now to promote adoption of EHRs.  As efforts advance, we will turn our attention to other necessary supporting programs, some of which you will hear more about in the coming weeks, including defining what constitutes a “certified” EHR, which is one of the requirements to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

In the meantime, what can providers do to move toward becoming “meaningful users” – even in the absence of a formal definition?  Naturally, while understanding that the final definition will be adopted through a formal rulemaking process, it will be helpful to be as familiar as possible with the discussion of meaningful use criteria to date.  (You will find that information posted at healthit.hhs.gov/meaningfuluse.)

Armed with an understanding of the discussion of meaningful use as it unfolds, providers can begin to consider how their own practices or organizations might be reshaped to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through the use of an electronic health record system.  Be assured you will not be alone as you seek to adopt an EHR system.  Through our recently announced collaborative HITECH grants programs and others to be initiated later this year, we will continue to support providers in moving forward.  Additional details about the grants are also available in my previous update and at healthit.hhs.gov/HITECHgrants.

To some providers, particularly small or already stretched physician practices or small, rural hospitals, the path toward meaningful use may still seem arduous.  To others, who would just prefer to stick with the “status quo,” it may seem like an unwanted intrusion.  We believe that the time has come for coordinated action.  The price of inaction – in adverse events, lost patient lives, delayed or improper treatments, unnecessary procedures, excessive costs, and so on – is just too high, and will only get worse.

There is much at stake and much to do.  We must relieve the crushing burden of health care costs in this country by improving efficiency, and assuring the highest level of patient care and safety regardless of geography or demographics.  By using current technologies in a meaningful way, as well as technology to be developed in the future, we will take great strides toward solving some of the most vexing problems facing our health care system and creating a new platform for innovative solutions to health care.

I look forward to providing periodic updates, and to continued interactions with all the communities that have so much to gain from this profound transformation.

Sincerely,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark