?>

State HIE, REC and Job Training Grant Recipients

February 12th, 2010 by HITREC 1 comment »

State HIE, REC and Job Training Grant Recipients for Health IT, Training Workers for Health Jobs of the Future

A complete listing of the state HIE, REC and job training grant recipients is as follows:

State HIE Awards:

State HIE Awardee Award Amount
Alabama Medicaid Agency $10,564,789
Arizona Governor’s Office of Economic Recovery $9,377,000
Arkansas Dept of Finance and Administration $7,909,401
California Health and Human Services Agency $38,752,536
Colorado Regional Health Information Organization $9,175,777
Delaware Health Information Network $4,680,284
Government of the District of Columbia $5,189,709
Georgia Department of Community Health $13,003,003
Office of the Governor (Guam) $1,600,000
The Hawaii Health Information Exchange $5,602,318
Illinois Department of Health care and Family Services $18,837,639
Kansas Health Information Exchange Project $9,010,066
Cabinet for Health and Family Services (Kentucky) $9,750,000
State of Maine/Governor’s Office of Health Policy & Finance $6,599,401
Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation $10,599,719
Michigan Department of Health $14,993,085
Minnesota Department of Health $9,622,000
Missouri Depart of Social Services $13,765,040
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services $6,133,426
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services $5,457,856
Lovelace Clinic Foundation, New Mexico $7,070,441
New York eHealth Collaborative Inc. $22,364,782
Commonwealth of the NMI, Department of Public Health $800,000
North Carolina Department of State Treasurer $12,950,860
Ohio Health Information Partnership LLC $14,872,199
Oklahoma Health Care Authority $8,883,741
Pacific Ecommerce Development Corporation (American Samoa) $600,000
State of Oregon $8,579,992
Governor’s Office of Health Care Reform Commonwealth of Pennsylvania $17,140,446
Oticina del Gobernador La Fortaeza (Puerto Rico) $7,770,980
Rhode Island Quality Institute $5,280,000
State of Tennessee $11,664,580
Utah Department of Health $6,296,705
Vermont Department of Human Services $5,034,328
Virgin Islands Department of Health $1,000,000
Virginia Department of Health $11,613,537
Health Care Authority (Washington) $11,300,000
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources $7,819,000
Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services $9,441,000
Office of the Governor (Wyoming) $4,873,000
Total Award Amount $385,978,640

Regional Extension Center Awards:

RECs Awardee Award Amount
Altarum Institute, Michigan $19,619,990
Arkansas Foundation For Medical Care $7,400,000
CIMRO of Nebraska $6,647,371
Colorado RHIO $12,475,000
District of Columbia Primary Care Association $5,488,437
Fund for Public Health New York $21,754,010
Greater Cincinnati HealthBridge (Ohio-Kentucky) $9,738,000
Health Choice Network, Inc.,Florida $8,500,000
HealthInsight, Utah-Nevada $6,917,783
Iowa IFMC $5,508,019
Kansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc. $7,000,000
Key Health Alliance (Stratis Health), Minnesota – North Dakota $19,000,000
Lovelace Clinic, New Mexico $6,175,000
Massachusetts Technology Park Cooperation $13,433,107
MetaStar, Inc, Wisconsin $9,125,000
Morehouse School of Medicine, Inc., Georgia $19,521,542
New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) $26,534,999
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill $13,569,169
Northern California Regional Extension Center $17,286,081
Northern Illinois University $7,546,000
Northwestern University $7,649,533
OCHIN Inc. (Primary), Oregon $13,201,499
Ohio Health Information Partnership $28,500,000
Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality, Inc. $5,331,685
Purdue University $12,000,000
Qsource (Tennessee) $7,256,155
Qualis Health, Washington – Idaho $12,846,482
Rhode Island Quality Institute $6,000,000
Southern California Regional Extension Center $13,961,339
Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. $6,762,080
VHQC and the Center for Innovative Technology, for The Virginia Consortium $12,425,000
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc. $6,000,000
Total Award Amount $375,173,281

Job Training Awards:

Healthcare / High Growth Grant Recipient Award Amount
Calhoun Community College $3,470,830
Mid-South Community College $3,391,053
South Arkansas Community College $3,520,612
Kern Community College District (KCCD) $2,768,572
Los Rios Community College District $4,988,561
Mt. San Antonio Community College District $2,239,714
San Diego State University Research Foundation $4,953,575
San Jose State University Research Foundation $5,000,000
San Bernardino Community College District $4,260,863
Youth Policy Institute $3,623,473
Spanish Speaking Unity Council $3,559,139
Otero Junior College $4,999,350
National Council of La Raza $3,457,516
Providence Health Foundation of Providence Hospital $4,953,999
DeKalb Technical College (DTC) $2,043,859
Governors State University $4,994,686
Indianapolis Private Industry Council, Inc. $4,885,812
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana $5,000,000
Iowa Workforce Development $3,403,164
Maysville Community and Technical College $2,007,637
Louisiana Technical College, Greater Acadiana Region 4 $4,859,040
Southern University at Shreveport $4,296,308
Maine Department of Labor $4,892,213
The Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) $4,928,654
Macomb Community College $4,971,642
American Indian Opportunities Industrialization Center $5,000,000
Northland Community and Technical College $4,996,844
MN State Colleges & Universities DBA Pine Technical College $4,230,950
South Central College $4,506,101
The Montgomery Institute $4,519,625
Full Employment Council $4,998,344
Crowder College $3,576,760
Maryville University – St. Louis $4,699,354
University of New Hampshire $2,944,732
Passaic County Community College $4,475,041
Fulton Montgomery Community College (FMCC) $2,865,657
Hudson Valley Community College (HVCC) $3,382,200
University Behavioral Associates, Inc. $5,000,000
Workforce Investment Board of Herkimer, Madison, and Oneida Counties $2,700,096
Goodwill Industries, Inc., Serving E. Neb and SW Iowa $2,007,846
Nevada Cancer Institute $3,262,676
Berea Children’s Home $4,927,843
BioOhio $5,000,000
Cincinnati State Technical and Community College $4,935,132
Columbus State Community College $4,605,303
Enterprise for Employment and Education $2,373,073
Trident Technical College $2,624,532
Florence-Darlington Technical College (FDTC) $4,346,351
The University of South Dakota $5,000,000
Centerstone of Tennessee, Inc. $5,000,000
North Central Texas College $4,150,005
San Jacinto Community College District $4,722,919
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB) $4,655,799
Shenandoah Valley Workforce Investment Board, Inc. (SVWIB) $4,951,991
Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board $5,000,000
Total $226,929,446

Additional information about the state HIE and RECs may be found at http://HealthIT.HHS.gov/statehie and http://healthit.hhs.gov/extensionprogram

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program

February 12th, 2010 by Frank No comments »

State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program Awards

Early 2010 marked the first announcement of awards to 40 states and State Designated Entities (SDE) under HITECH’s State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program. This Program funds states’ efforts to rapidly build capacity for exchanging health information across the health care system both within and across states. Awardees are responsible for increasing connectivity and enabling patient-centric information flow to improve the quality and efficiency of care. Key to this is the continual evolution and advancement of necessary governance, policies, technical services, business operations, and financing mechanisms for HIE over each State and SDE’s four-year performance period. This Program is building on existing efforts to advance regional and state level health information exchange while moving toward nationwide interoperability.

Over the next several weeks the remaining cooperative agreements will be awarded to approved applicants; these awardees will join the 40 awardees announced today in advancing mechanisms for health information sharing in their states and across the country.

State grantees in the first series of awards:

  • Rhode Island Quality Institute
  • State of Oregon
  • Georgia Department of Community Health
  • Kansas Health Information Exchange Project
  • Cabinet for Health and Family Services (KY)
  • Missouri Depart of Social Services
  • Colorado Regional Health Information Organization
  • Health Care Authority (Washington)
  • Governor’s Office of Health Care Reform Commonwealth of PA
  • Virginia Department of Health
  • State of Maine/Governor’s Office of Health Policy & Finance
  • The Hawaii Health Information Exchange
  • Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
  • Government of the District of Columbia
  • Minnesota Department of Health
  • Virgin Islands Department of Health
  • Oticina del Gobernador La Fortaeza (PR)
  • Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
  • New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
  • Alabama Medicaid Agency
  • California Health and Human Services Agency
  • Utah Department of Health
  • Vermont Department of Human Services
  • Massachusetts Technology Park Corporation
  • Lovelace Clinic Foundation (New Mexico)
  • State of Tennessee
  • North Carolina Department of State Treasurer
  • West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
  • Arkansas Dept of Finance and Administration
  • Delaware Health Information Network
  • Michigan Department of Health
  • New York eHealth Collaborative, Inc.
  • Oklahoma Health Care Authority
  • Pacific Ecommerce Development Corporation (American Samoa)
  • Ohio Health Information Partnership, LLC
  • Arizona Governor’s Office of Economic Recovery
  • Nevada Department of Health and Human Services
  • Office of the Governor (Guam)
  • Commonwealth of the NMI, Department of Public Health
  • Office of the Governor (WY)
Information & Resources
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

President Obama Announces Recovery Act Awards to Community Health Centers in More Than 30 States

December 10th, 2009 by Frank 1 comment »

President Obama Announces Recovery Act Awards to Build, Renovate Community Health Centers in More Than 30 States

Program to Create Jobs in Low-Income Communities, Help CHCs Serve More Than 500,000 Additional Patients

WASHINGTON – Today President Obama announced nearly $600 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) awards to support major construction and renovation projects at 85 community health centers nationwide and help networks of health centers adopt Electronic Health Records (EHR) and other Health Information Technology (HIT) systems.  The awards are expected to not only create new job opportunities in construction and health care, but also help provide care for more than half a million additional patients in underserved communities.  The President also announced a new demonstration initiative to support the delivery of advanced primary care to Medicare beneficiaries through community health centers.

“Together, these three initiatives – funding for construction, technology and a medical home demonstration project – won’t just save more money, and create more jobs, they’ll give more people the peace of mind of knowing that health care will be there for them and their families when they need it,” said President Obama.  “Ultimately, that’s what health reform is really about.”

“One of the first investments we made through the Recovery Act was in supporting our nation’s community health centers – and today we build on that progress by funding new construction and improvement projects at more than 80 facilities nationwide,” said Vice President Biden.  “This is what the Recovery Act is all about – providing immediate assistance for hard-hit families, improving our nation’s infrastructure and creating new opportunities for stable, well-paid work.”

To qualify for funding, a health facility must be a Federally Qualified “Community” Health Center.  Grants of $508.5 million will be provided through the Facility Investment Program (FIP) program to address pressing health center facility needs. Also, as much as $88 million will be available to help Health Center Controlled Networks improve operational effectiveness and clinical quality in health centers by providing management, financial, technology and clinical support services. 

The new Recovery Act funds are the latest in a series of grants awarded to community health centers, which deliver preventive and primary care services at more than 7,500 service delivery sites around the country to patients regardless of their ability to pay.  Health centers serve more than 17 million patients, about 40 percent of whom have no health insurance.

Both programs will be administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

President Obama directed the Department of Health and Human Services to implement a demonstration initiative designed to evaluate the impact of the advanced primary care practice model on access, quality and cost of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries served by community health centers.

This model, known as the “medical home,” promotes accessible, continuous, and coordinated family-centered care.  Developed and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the demonstration will last three years.  CMS anticipates that up to 500 health centers will participate.

“Because community health centers already provide comprehensive health care to people who face the greatest barriers to accessing care, these demonstration projects have the potential to support and improve the care delivered not only to Medicare beneficiaries, but also to others who rely on community health centers for primary care,” said HHS Secretary Kathleen G. Sebelius.

HRSA has received a total of $2 billion through the Recovery Act to expand health care services to low-income and uninsured individuals through its health center program. To date, nearly $1.9 billion of these funds have been awarded to community-based organizations across the country.

FIP grants are listed below.  They were awarded through a competitive process:

Name of Health Center City State Award Amount
Health Services Inc. Montgomery Ala. $11,231,000
Seldovia Village Tribe Seldovia Alaska $2,258,091
Alaska Island Community Services Wrangell Alaska $3,736,490
North Country Healthcare Inc. Flagstaff Ariz. $7,433,776
Canyonlands Community Health Care Page Ariz. $1,840,695
Clinica Sierra Vista Bakersfield Calif. $4,008,251
Solano County Health & Social Services Dept. Fairfield Calif. $2,194,196
South Central Family Health Center Los Angeles Calif. $953,743
Contra Costa County Health Services Dept. Martinez Calif. $12,000,000
Golden Valley Health Center Merced Calif. $9,573,010
Petaluma Health Center Inc. Petaluma Calif. $8,906,986
Clinica De Salud Del Valle De Salinas Salinas Calif. $2,327,857
Santa Clara Valley Health And Hospital System San Jose Calif. $2,643,343
San Mateo County Health Services Agency San Mateo Calif. $1,765,876
Centro De Salud De La Comunidad San Ysidro San Ysidro Calif. $9,754,515
Vista Community Clinic Vista Calif. $11,473,212
Charter Oak Health Center Inc. Hartford Conn. $10,000,000
Community Health Services Inc. Hartford Conn. $6,160,675
Unity Health Care Inc. Washington D.C. $12,000,000
Suncoast Community Health Centers Inc. Riverview Fla. $3,767,091
Project Health Inc. Sumterville Fla. $5,222,774
Tampa Family Health Centers Inc. Tampa Fla. $2,903,145
Palmetto Health Council Inc. Atlanta Ga. $6,317,838
Southwest Georgia Health Care Inc. Richland Ga. $1,208,700
Kokua Kalihi Valley Comprehensive Family Services Honolulu Hawaii $1,500,000
Lawndale Christian Health Center Chicago Ill. $10,000,000
Greater Elgin Family Care Center Elgin Ill. $2,452,172
PCC Community Wellness Center Oak Park Ill. $4,053,042
Crusaders Central Clinic Association Rockford Ill. $5,342,337
Healthnet Inc. Indianapolis Ind. $10,426,357
Primary Health Care Inc. Des Moines Iowa $2,615,429
Bucksport Regional Health Center Bucksport Maine $2,459,420
Sacopee Valley Health Center Parsonsfield Maine $802,951
Choptank Community Health System Inc. Denton Md. $1,085,542
Dorchester House Multi-Service Center Dorchester Mass. $7,024,029
East Boston Neighborhood Health Center East Boston Mass. $12,000,000
Healthfirst Family Care Center Inc. Fall River Mass. $12,000,000
Community Health Connections Inc. Fitchburg Mass. $10,732,754
Lowell Community Health Center Lowell Mass. $9,351,067
Mattapan Community Health Center Mattapan Mass. $11,550,000
Greater New Bedford Community Health Center New Bedford Mass. $5,331,145
Whittier Street Health Committee Inc. Roxbury Mass. $12,000,000
Baldwin Family Health Care Inc Baldwin Mich. $3,000,000
Intercare Community Health Network Bangor Mich. $8,500,000
Cedar Riverside Peoples Center Minneapolis Minn. $2,113,595
Central Mississippi Civic Improvement Jackson Miss. $3,881,043
Nevada Rural Health Centers Inc. Carson City Nev. $11,253,351
Avis Goodwin Community Health Center Dover N.H. $4,957,300
Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc. Littleton N.H. $2,641,157
Lamprey Health Care Newmarket N.H. $2,150,250
Zufall Health Center Inc. Dover N.J. $3,920,442
Ocean Health Initiatives Inc. Lakewood N.J. $4,753,399
Newark City Health and Human Services Newark N.J. $4,996,563
Newark Community Health Centers Inc. Newark N.J. $6,453,000
La Familia Medical Center Santa Fe N.M. $1,216,338
Montefiore Medical Center Bronx N.Y. $795,000
Urban Health Plan Inc. Bronx N.Y. $12,000,000
Family Health Network of Central New York Inc. Cortland N.Y. $1,400,387
Community Healthcare Network New York N.Y. $1,365,788
Family Healthcare Center Fargo N.D. $6,666,583
Capital Park Family Health Center Columbus Ohio $4,417,688
Muskingum Valley Health Centers Inc. McConnelsville Ohio $5,997,980
Butler County Community Health Consortium Inc. Middletown Ohio $4,669,197
Healthsource of Ohio Inc. Milford Ohio $9,764,690
Great Salt Plains Health Center Inc. Cherokee Okla. $2,828,647
Oklahoma Community Health Services Inc. Oklahoma City Okla. $11,985,000
Central City Concern Portland Ore. $8,950,000
Cornerstone Care Burgettstown Pa. $2,574,643
Keystone Rural Health Center Chambersburg Pa. $11,515,000
Southeast Lancaster Health Services Lancaster Pa. $3,250,000
Esperanza Health Center Philadelphia Pa. $6,552,799
Greater Philadelphia Health Action Inc. Philadelphia Pa. $3,937,796
Squirrel Hill Health Center Pittsburgh Pa. $792,700
Salud Integral En La Montana Inc. Naranjito P.R. $8,752,140
Rincon Rural Health Initiative Project Inc Rincon P.R $5,915,227
Little River Medical Center Inc. Little River S.C. $5,523,205
Beaufort-Jasper Comprehensive Health Services Inc. Ridgeland S.C. $7,912,493
Brownsville Community Health Center Brownsville Texas $7,500,000
Project Vida Health Center El Paso Texas $6,000,422
Su Clinica Familiar Harlingen Texas $7,500,000
El Centro Del Barrio Inc. San Antonio Texas $11,051,134
Heart of Texas Community Health Center Inc. Waco Texas $5,296,239
Blue Ridge Medical Center Inc. Arrington Va. $5,000,000
Community Health Center of Burlington Inc. Burlington Vt. $10,964,476
La Clinica/South Columbia Rural Health Pasco Wash. $7,425,870
        Total:  $508,549,051

FACT SHEET

Community Health Centers and the Recovery Act

Health centers deliver preventive and primary care services at more than 7,500 service delivery sites around the country to patients regardless of their ability to pay; charges for services are set according to income.  Health centers serve more than 17 million patients, about 38 percent of whom have no health insurance.

Three sets of health center awards have already been funded through Recovery Act appropriations on the following dates:

  • On March 2, President Obama announced grants worth $155 million to establish 126 new health center sites.  Those grants will provide access to essential preventive and primary health care for more than 750,000 people in 39 states and two territories.
  • On March 27, HHS also awarded $338 Million in Increased Demand for Services grants for health centers. Health centers are using these funds to provide care to more than 2 million additional patients over the next two years, including approximately 1 million uninsured people. In addition, over the next two years, health centers will use the funds to create and retain approximately 6,400 health center jobs.
  • On June 29, First Lady Michelle Obama announced the release of $851 million in Recovery Act grants to upgrade over 1,500 health center sites and open their doors to more patients.  More than 650 centers will use the funds for health information technology (HIT) systems, and nearly 400 health centers will adopt and expand the use of electronic health records.

The Facility Investment Program awards announced today are the fourth set of health center grants provided through the Recovery Act. 

Facility Investment Program (FIP) Grants

The Obama Administration announced $508.5 million awarded in Facility Investment Program grants to community health centers nationwide to address the pressing needs of health center facilities and expanded their capacities to serve an additional 500,000 patients.  The funds were made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act).  The Facility Investment Program (FIP) grants support major construction and renovation at our nation’s health centers.  These funds will help health centers build new facilities, modernize current sites and create employment opportunities in underserved communities.

Recipients of FIP funds are expected to commit grant funds and complete the proposed projects within two years. The grants will cover two types of projects:

1. Alteration/renovation: This project type includes work required to modernize, improve or change the interior arrangements or other physical characteristics of an existing facility, and purchase/install equipment. Alterations and renovations make existing space usable for another purpose. This type of project does not increase square footage. 

2. Construction (new site or expansion of existing site): This project type includes—(i) adding a new structure to an existing site that increases the total square footage of the facility; and (ii) permanently affixing structure (e.g., modular units, prefabricated buildings) to real property (i.e., land).

FIP grants, along with the entire health center program, are administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Health Center Controlled Networks (HCCN)

The Obama Administration announced the availability of $88 million in grants to help networks of health centers adopt Electronic Health Records (EHR) and other Health Information Technology (HIT) systems.  The funds are part of the $1.5 billion allotted to the Health Resources and Services Administration, a component of the Department of Health and Human Services, by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) for construction, renovation, equipment, and the acquisition of HIT systems for health center programs.

The Health Center Controlled Networks (HCCN) grant program was developed in 1994 to support the creation, development, and operation of electronic networks, controlled by groups of collaborating health centers, to improve health center operations. The networks are controlled by and operate on behalf of HRSA-supported health centers.  Each network comprises at least three collaborating organizations.

HCCNs integrate core business functions among their individual health center members, who may be anywhere in the country, but are often in the same state or region.  The core business functions these networks share are: administrative, clinical, managed care, fiscal, or health information systems.

Networks provide these functions at or below marketplace cost to their members.  In launching a network, members assess their respective environments and existing infrastructure to determine the most appropriate mix of business functions to share.  The networks seek to:

  • increase access for the low-income, uninsured population they predominantly serve;
  • enhanced the efficiency of their operations; or
  • create a higher level of performance and value.

Networks that receive HCCN funds are given great flexibility in determining their activities.  Each network is unique, depending on its state or regional environment, marketplace, collaborators, needs and interests.

HRSA awarded $36 million in grants to support the operations of 53 Health Center Controlled Networks in fiscal year 2009.

Medicare Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration Initiative

Today, President Obama directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to implement a demonstration initiative to support federal qualified health centers in delivering advanced primary care to Medicare beneficiaries.  HHS’ agencies, Health Resources and Services Administration and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, will work together to conduct this 3-year demonstration and anticipate that 500 federally qualified health centers will participate. 

Advanced Primary Care Model

The Advanced Primary Care model, also known as the patient-centered medical home, promotes targeted, accessible, continuous, and coordinated family-centered care.  The demonstration is designed to evaluate the impact of the advanced primary care practice model on access, quality and cost of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries served by federal qualified health centers.

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC)

FQHCs provide comprehensive primary and preventive health care for medically underserved populations who face the greatest economic and geographic barriers to accessing care.  Overseen by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the Health Center program is a national network of more than 1,100 community, migrant, homeless and public housing health center grantees. These organizations provide health care at more than 7,500 clinical sites, ranging from large medical facilities to mobile vans.  In 2008, health centers served more than 17 million medically underserved people.  FQHCs provide an environment to demonstrate the benefits of medical homes can offer to Medicare beneficiaries.

New Medicare Demonstration

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and HRSA will develop the demonstration, which would include a solicitation of applications from FQHC grantees.  To participate, FQHC grantees will need to demonstrate that their clinic sites have the capacity to deliver continuous and coordinated care across providers and settings, including improving access to care by expanding service hours, facilitating and following up on referrals, and managing medications prescribed by different physicians.   FQHC clinic sites selected to participate in the demonstration will receive a monthly care management fee for each Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary they enroll into the demonstration, in addition to payment for any other covered Medicare services they provide.

Research Design

This demonstration will evaluate whether federal qualified health centers that deliver advanced primary care improve access and quality, promote appropriate use of services, and reduce health care costs.  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will begin soliciting applications in spring 2010, aiming to begin implementation of the 3-year demonstration initiative in January 2011.  CMS will conduct an independent evaluation of this demonstration.

** This release has been corrected.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

Nationwide Beacon Community Program for Health Information Exchange

December 6th, 2009 by Frank No comments »

HHS Secretary Sebelius Announces Plans to Establish Health IT “Beacon Communities”

$235 million set aside to fund nationwide Beacon Community Program

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Dr. David Blumenthal, HHS’ National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, announced today plans to make available $235 million to support an innovative Beacon Community Program.  The program will work to accelerate and demonstrate the ability of health information technology to transform local health care systems, and improve the lives of Americans and the performance of the health care providers who serve them.  The Beacon Community Program will include $220 million in grants to build and strengthen health IT infrastructure and health information exchange capabilities, including strong privacy and security measures for data exchange, within 15 communities.  An additional $15 million will be provided for technical assistance to the communities and to evaluate the success of the program.

“Health information technology will make our health care system more efficient and improve care for every American,” Secretary Sebelius said.  “The Beacon Community Program is a critical step forward as we work to expand the use of health information technology in hospitals and doctor’s offices across the country.”

Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Beacon Community Program will take communities at the cutting edge of electronic health record (EHR) adoption and health information exchange and push them to a new level of health care quality and efficiency.  The program will establish cooperative agreements with communities to build and strengthen their health IT infrastructure and health information exchange capabilities to achieve measurable improvements in health care quality, safety, efficiency, and population health.  The resulting experience will inform efforts throughout the United States to support the meaningful use of EHRs, the primary goal of the federal government’s new health IT initiative.

“We recognize that better health care does not come solely from the adoption of technology itself but through the ongoing private and secure exchange and use of health information to provide the best possible information at the point of patient care,” said Dr. Blumenthal.

Cooperative agreements will be awarded to 15 qualified non-profit organizations or government entities representing diverse geographic areas, including rural and underserved communities.  To qualify for the Beacon Community Program, applicants are expected to:

  • Build off of existing health IT infrastructure and exchange to demonstrate care and cost savings;
  • Have rates of EHR adoption that are significantly higher than published national estimates; and,
  • Coordinate with recently announced Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) programs for Regional Extension Centers and State Health Information Exchange to develop and disseminate best practices for adoption and meaningful use of EHRs to support national goals for widespread use of health IT.

“The Beacon Community Program will help provide more hard evidence that health IT exchange can make a significant and positive difference in the delivery and value of care,” stated Dr. Blumenthal.

Information about cooperative agreement applications will be available shortly at http://HealthIT.HHS.gov/.

For more information about the implementation of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act programs in the US Department of Health and Human Services, please see: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery.

Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers

Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

The HITECH Foundation for Information Exchange

November 12th, 2009 by Frank No comments »

The HITECH Foundation for Information Exchange

Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

As the many activities mandated by the HITECH Act move forward, I want to take a moment to share my vision of the overarching goal and some of its implications.  Our goal, above all else, is to make care better for patients, and to make it patient-centered.  Information policy and health IT policy should serve that goal.

A key premise: information should follow the patient, and artificial obstacles – technical, business related, bureaucratic – should not get in the way.  As a doctor, I have many times wanted access to data that I knew were buried in the computers or paper records of another health system across town.  Neither my care nor my patients were well served in those instances.  That is what we must get beyond.  That is the goal we will pursue, and it will inform all our policy choices now and going forward.  This means that information exchange must cross institutional and business boundaries.  Because that is what patients need.  Exchange within business groups will not be sufficient – the goal is to have information flow seamlessly and effortlessly to every nook and cranny of our health system, when and where it is needed, just like the blood within our arteries and veins meets our bodies’ vital needs.

If we are to reap the benefit of information exchange, Americans must also be assured that the most advanced technology and proven business practices will be employed to secure the privacy and security of their personal health information, both within and across electronic systems, and that persons and organizations who hold personal health data are trustworthy custodians of the information.  We must have comprehensive, clear, and sustainable policies that strengthen existing protections, fill gaps as they emerge, fortify new opportunities for patients’ access to and control of their information, and align with evolving technologies.  I will devote a separate letter to this critical issue and the many activities mandated by the HITECH Act that we are developing.
On the question of exchange, however, the HITECH Act is pretty specific about eliminating inappropriate barriers.

It squarely tackles the commercial barriers.  The HITECH Act calls for the “development of a nationwide health information technology infrastructure that allows for the electronic use and exchange of information and that…promotes a more effective marketplace, greater competition…[and] increased consumer choice” among other goals.  (Section 3001(b))  This means we cannot support arrangements that restrict the secure, private exchange of information required for patient care across provider or network boundaries.  Some of these arrangements may improve care for those inside their walls.  But ultimately, they have the potential to carve the nation up into disconnected silos of information, and thus, to undermine the vision of a secure, interoperable, nationwide health information infrastructure, which the law requires us to establish.  Consumers, patients and their caretakers should never feel locked into a single health system or exchange arrangement because it does not permit or encourage the sharing of information.

It tackles the economic barriers.  The HITECH Act incentives for providers and hospitals are powerful tools.  While the official definition of “Meaningful Use” won’t be finalized until next year, the HITECH Act specifically highlights “information exchange” as one requirement for the incentives.

It tackles the technical barriers.  The HITECH Act focuses on “interoperability” or “interoperable products.”  In plain English, this means that our policies, programs, and incentives must aim for electronic health record (EHR) software and systems that can share information with different EHRs and networks so that information can follow patients wherever they go.  And to build the pipelines to carry this information, HHS is directed to invest in the infrastructure to “support the nationwide electronic exchange and use of health information …including connecting health information exchanges…”  (Section 3011)  This means we will work with all our partners in the health and IT industries and with organizations that are committed to information sharing to develop the technologies and policies that can help us deliver information securely, privately, and accurately to whomever needs to see it on behalf of the patient’s health.  We must ensure interoperability for the future.

It provides building blocks for information exchange across jurisdictions.  The grants for states and state-designated entities in Section 3013 – which will total $564 million – target information exchange across boundaries, not only within each state but explicitly as part of a nationwide framework.  We will start announcing the awards this winter.  These grantees’ activities must support interoperability that lets patient data follow the patient across political and geographic boundaries.  The grantees will be our partners in building the nationwide infrastructure mentioned previously.

In short, the HITECH Act not only authorizes but requires us to mobilize all our policies, programs, and incentives to give the American people the patient-centric care they deserve and expect.

I look forward to engaging all our partners in this unique opportunity.

Regards,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) encourages you to share this information as we work together to enhance the quality, safety and value of care and the health of all Americans through the use of electronic health records and health information technology.

For more information and to receive regular updates from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, please subscribe to our Health IT News list.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

Health IT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Meeting

October 21st, 2009 by Frank No comments »

Health IT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Meeting

Note about this meetingThe Workgroup will be hearing testimony from invited experts and stakeholders in the area of electronic exchange of laboratory information. They met on October 20, 2009.  Here is a link to their agenda.

CALL TO ORDER
• Judy Sparrow, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.  Overview (warning: PPT file)

Overview of Meeting
• Deven McGraw, Chair, Information Exchange Workgroup
• Micky Tripathi, Co‐Chair, Information Exchange Workgroup Background
• Angela Brice-Smith, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
• Kelly Cronin, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Part I: Business Issues related to the Electronic Exchange of Laboratory Data
• Mike Nolte, GE Health Systems
• Vasu Manjrekar, eClinicalWorks
• Phil Marshall, WebMD
• Tim Ryan, Quest Diagnostics
• Susan Neill, Texas Department of State Health Services

Part II: Business Issues related to the Electronic Exchange of Laboratory Data
• Laura Rosas, New York City Primary Care Information Project
• Sarah Chouinard, Primary Care Systems, Inc. and Community Health Network of West Virginia
• Raymond Scott, Axolotl Corporation
• Areg Boyamyan and Jim Timmons, Foundation Laboratory

Regulatory and Policy Issues
• Joy Pritts, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute
• Don Horton, LabCorp
• Jonah Frohlich, California Health and Human Service Agency
• Walter Sujansky, Sujansky & Associates

Public Comment

Some excerpts:

Laura Rosas, New York City Primary Care Information Project (PDF file):

“Unfortunately, electronic lab interfaces have proved to be one of the greatest barriers encountered in this project. Through great effort on the part of our EHR vendor, commercial laboratories, and the PCIP’s dedicated staff, we have managed to provide electronic lab interfaces to approximately two-thirds of our practices over a period of two years. It has proven nearly impossible under current processes to ensure that practices have an electronic laboratory interface at the same time that they go “live” on their EHR. Many of these practices waited months before they had an electronic interface, and subsequently needed to create complicated “workarounds” in the interim. On average, implementing, testing, and validating a lab interface for a PCIP practice takes about 10-14 weeks.”

Jonah Frohlich, California Health and Human Service Agency (PDF file)

“There is virtually no standardization of lab messaging in the industry today. In my experience working on ELINCS projects – initiatives that use highly constrained HL7 messages or “implementation guides” to support electronic lab results delivery – all hospitals needed considerable outside technical assistance to comply with the standard. Labs required assistance to adopt the LOINC coding scheme; a standard naming system for lab tests, and labs were unprepared to adopt SNOMED or UCUM; standard coding schemes for results and units of measures. The lab information systems the hospitals operated had internal “proprietary” codes for test names, and they had little expertise to “map” these codes to LOINC. These labs relied heavily on external technical assistance to do the necessary mapping for the most frequent 95% of reported tests as required by ELINCS – approximately 150 of the thousands of reportable tests in their databases.”

Vasu Manjrekar, eClinicalWorks (PDF file)

“Despite a concentrated effort on the part of eClinicalWorks and its Reference Lab partners over past several years, it has been difficult to provide electronic laboratory interface at go “live” on their EHR. Many of these practices wait months before they get an electronic interface, and subsequently needed to create “workarounds” in the interim. On average, implementing, testing, and validating a lab interface for a practice with National Reference Lab companies take about anywhere from 4-14 weeks.”

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

AMGA MGMA Perot to Provide Services to Regional Extension Centers

October 9th, 2009 by Frank 1 comment »

AMGA, MGMA and Perot Form Alliance for Services to New Regional Extension Centers

The American Medical Group Association (AMGA), the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) and Perot Systems Corporation (NYSE: PER) today announced the formation of an alliance of the three organizations to offer electronic health record (EHR)-related training and implementation services to newly established Health Information Technology (HIT) Regional Extension Centers (RECs or Extension Centers).

“The HIT Regional Extension Centers are going to play a critical role in helping targeted physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers recognize the benefits of Health Information Technology and how it will improve patient care and healthcare economics,” said Donald Fisher, Ph.D., President and CEO of AMGA. “Through the Alliance, we are prepared to help these newly established Extension Centers have an immediate impact in their designated regions by providing a number of key services and competitive solutions.”

“MGMA is committed to helping medical group practices make the right decisions when it comes to implementing EHRs and making other critical technology decisions,” said William Jessee, M.D., FACMPE, President and CEO of MGMA. “We believe this partnership represents a natural extension of our mission, and we are pleased to be a part of the team helping the Extension Centers achieve this critical mission.”

“The services the Alliance can provide are geared towards educating physician practices, hospitals and other qualifying healthcare organizations about EHR and HIE technology,” said Chuck Lyles, president of Perot Systems healthcare group. “This will allow these groups to make the most informed decision about the appropriate EHR for their organization and how they can successfully manage the implementation and integration into their current workflows.”

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

CMS CHIPRA Dental State Health Official Letter

October 7th, 2009 by Frank No comments »

CMS Issues State Letter for Dental Coverage in CHIP

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop S2-26-12
Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Center for Medicaid and State Operations
SHO #09-012
CHIPRA # 7
October 7, 2009

RE: Dental Coverage in CHIP

Dear State Health Official (full letter on the CMS site):
The Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA), Public Law 111-3, reauthorizes the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) under title XXI of the Social Security Act (the Act). CHIPRA ensures that States are able to continue their existing CHIP programs and provides funding to expand health insurance coverage to additional low-income uninsured children including children already eligible for CHIP or Medicaid but not enrolled. The purpose of this letter is to provide general guidance on some of the provisions in section 501 of CHIPRA, including the dental benefit provisions and the State option to provide dental-only supplemental coverage, pending the issuance of regulations.

Required Dental Services

Section 2103(c)(5) of the Act, as added by section 501 of CHIPRA, requires that “child health assistance provided to a targeted low-income child shall include coverage of dental services necessary to prevent disease and promote oral health, restore oral structures to health and function, and treat emergency conditions.” This requirement applies to all child health assistance coverage described in section 2103 and is effective October 1, 2009.

Medicaid Expansions

States that provide title XXI coverage to children through a Medicaid expansion program are required to provide Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) services, as defined in section 1905(r) of the Act. The dental services provided under a Medicaid expansion program through EPSDT will be considered to meet the requirements of this provision.

Separate CHIP Programs

States that provide coverage in a separate CHIP program may choose between two methods of providing the dental services as required by section 2103(c)(5) of the Act. The State may define the services in the dental benefit package and demonstrate that the package includes all of the services required by the statute. In so doing, the State should specify the periodicity schedule with which preventative and restorative services, such as cleanings and fillings, would be provided, as well as whether these services are sufficient to prevent further disease, as required by section 2103(c)(5). This applies to State-defined benefit packages and dental benchmark packages as described below.
Alternatively, the State may provide a dental benefit package that is equivalent to one of the three dental benchmark packages described in the CHIPRA statute. Under the statute, there is no option in new section 2103(c)(5) of the Act for proving actuarial equivalence or modifying the benefit package. States may, however, cover benefits in addition to the dental benchmark plan consistent with the standards in section 2103(c)(5).

In order to fully describe a State dental benefit package under a separate CHIP program, and ensure that the benefits are sufficient to meet the statutory requirements, a State should describe both the types of covered benefits and the covered amount or duration of those benefits. The amount or duration should also be expressed through identification of the periodicity schedule that the State will use in its program. The periodicity schedule sets the frequency by which certain services should be provided and will be covered. We encourage States to rely on nationally recognized standards, including Medicaid dental periodicity guidelines used for children under EPSDT or the guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). The link to AAPD’s periodicity guidelines can be found at: http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/G_Periodicity.pdf.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

Secretary Sebelius Awards $40 Million to States to Find, Enroll Children in CHIP, Medicaid

October 1st, 2009 by Frank No comments »

Secretary Sebelius Awards $40 Million in Grants for Either Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today announced $40 million in grants to 69 grantees in 41 states and the District of Columbia to help them find and enroll children who are uninsured but eligible for either Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

“Today’s awards will help fulfill President Obama’s pledge to assure the health and well-being of our nation’s children,” said Secretary Sebelius.  “With millions of Americans either out of work or otherwise struggling to make ends meet during this recession, there is an even greater urgency to bring steady, reliable health care to children in these families who may have lost their coverage.”

Recognizing that millions of children are eligible for Medicaid or CHIP, but are therefore needlessly uninsured, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) set aside $100 million for fiscal years 2009-2013 expressly to help find and enroll eligible children.  Of the total outreach amount, $80 million will be given to states and other organizations, $10 million to Tribal organizations and $10 million for a national outreach effort. Today’s awards are for a two year period ending Dec. 31, 2011, which will then be followed by a second round of $40 million in new grants.

As called for in CHIPRA, grants were awarded to applicants whose outreach, enrollment and retention efforts will target geographic areas with high rates of eligible but uninsured children, particularly those with racial and ethnic minority groups who are uninsured at higher-than-average rates.  For example, 20 percent of the projects to be funded will target Hispanic children, with an emphasis on Hispanic teens, and 11 percent will focus on homeless children and seven percent will be aimed at Native American/Alaska Native children.

The vast majority of grantees will be using multiple, community-based approaches. One grantee in Missouri, for example, will work with a consortium of 35 churches in low-income, minority communities.  Those parishioners will go door-to-door to locate potentially eligible children and then help those families apply for CHIP or Medicaid coverage.  Another grantee will place self-service kiosks in community centers and Native American Chapter Houses (community halls) where there will also be staff available to help with applications if needed.  One state school system will track children who receive free or reduced cost lunches and, with the families’ permission, share that information with state health programs, which will, in turn, mail applications for CHIP and Medicaid to those families.  The state will also provide one-on-one-assistance with those applications.

The grant awards require that recipients be able to show actual increases in enrollment and retention of children already in the programs.  Both CHIP and Medicaid state agencies are to report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) the number of new enrollees and those who retained coverage that are directly attributable to the grant activities.  Grantees are also to report activities they believe were the most effective in finding, enrolling and maintaining children in these benefit programs.

“No child in America should go without decent health care,” said Cindy Mann, director of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations — the group within CMS that will administer the grants. “With the funds we are awarding today we hope to reduce the number of children who do.”

A list of grantees by state is below.

State

Grantee

Award

Arizona

Pima Community Access Program

$982,577

Alabama

Alabama Primary Care Association

$987,732

Tombigbee Healthcare Authority

$141,167

Alaska

Alaska Youth and Family Network

$198,304

Norton Sound Health Corporation

$72,999

Arkansas

St. Francis House NWA Inc., Community Clinic

$162,965

California

Providence Little Company of Mary Foundation

$317,144

Yolo County Children’s Alliance (YCCA)

$399,900

Colorado

Colorado Association of School Based Health Care

$499,835

Telluride Foundation

$301,410

Connecticut

Community Health Center Association of Connecticut

$988,177

Community Health Center, Inc. (CHC)

$400,584

District of Columbia

National Alliance for Hispanic Health

$984,144

Florida

Fanm Ayisyen Nan Miyami, Inc. (FANM)

$69,102

University of South Florida

$988,177

Georgia

West End Medical Centers Inc.

$571,135

Medical College of Georgia Research Institute

$986,827

Hawaii

Bay Clinic, Inc.

$200,000

Hawaii Primary Care Association

$488,187

Illinois

Chicago Public Schools

$235,173

Beacon Therapeutic School, Inc. of Chicago

$250,830

Idaho

Mountain States Group, Inc.

$287,896

Indiana

St. Vincent Health Inc.

$864,309

Kansas

Inter-Faith Ministries Wichita Inc.

$523,932

Keys for Networking

$866,749

Louisiana

Louisiana State Department of Health and Hospitals

$955,681

TECHE Action Board

$234,808

Maine

Maine Department of Health and Human Services

$680,249

Maine Primary Care Association

$311,061

Maryland

Garrett County Health Department

$200,000

MD Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

$988,177

Massachusetts

Health Care for All, Inc.

$410,815

South End Community Health Center

$304,385

Michigan

Michigan Primary Care Association

$915,079

YMCA of Greater Grand Rapids

$293,040

Minnesota

Portico Healthnet, Inc.

$988,177

Vietnamese Social Services of Minnesota

$280,000

Mississippi

Mississippi Primary Health Care Association

$988,152

Missouri

Missouri Coalition for Primary Health Care

$332,173

St. Louis Children’s Hospital Foundation

$985,373

Montana

Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services

$971,868

Nebraska

One World Community Health Centers Inc.

$706,264

New Hampshire

Cheshire Medical Center

$143,700

New Jersey

Health Research and Educational Trust of New Jersey

$988,177

New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services

$988,177

New Mexico

First Nations Community Health Source

$355,000

New Mexico Human Services Department

$957,221

New York

The Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital

$498,718

Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation

$988,177

North Carolina

North Carolina Pediatric Society Foundation

$678,210

Ohio

Dayton Public Schools

$327,900

Legal Aid Society of Greater Cincinnati

$316,418

Oklahoma

Oklahoma Health Care Authority

$988,177

Oregon

Oregon Department of Health and Human Services

$988,177

Northeast Oregon Network of LaGrande

$465,982

Pennsylvania

Concern for Health Options, Information, Care & Education (CHOICE)

$200,000

Consumer Health Coalition

$299,750

South Carolina

Palmetto Project, Inc.

$981,009

Texas

Texas Leadership Center

$988,177

YWCA of Lubbock, TX, INC.

$384,680

Utah

Association for Utah Community Health

$762,580

Virginia

Catholic Charities USA (CCUSA)

$957,617

Virginia Health Care Foundation

$988,154

Washington

HIP of Spokane County/Community Minded Enterprise (CME)

$299,766

Puget Sound Neighborhood Health Centers Neighborcare

$150,000

West Virginia

West Virginia Alliance for Sustainable Families

$330,700

Wyoming

Wind River Health Systems Inc.

$381,895

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Department of Health Services

$988,177

Wyoming

Wyoming Department of Health

$268,889

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark

“Meaningful” Progress Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange

October 1st, 2009 by Frank No comments »

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

I recently reported on our announcement of State Health Information Technology Grants and grants to establish Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers, as authorized under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).

Today I want to discuss the important term “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHRs) – both as a concept that underlies the movement toward an electronic health care environment and as a practical set of standards that will be issued as a proposed regulation by the end of 2009.

The HITECH Act provisions of the Recovery Act create a truly historic opportunity to transform our health system through unprecedented investments in the development of a nationwide electronic health information system.  This system will ultimately help facilitate, inform, measure, and sustain improvements in the quality, efficiency, and safety of health care available to every American.  Simply put, health professionals will be able to give better care, and their patients’ experience of care will improve, leading to better health outcomes overall.

As many of you are aware, the HITECH Act provides incentive payments to doctors and hospitals that adopt and meaningfully use health information technology.  Eligible physicians, including those in solo or small practices, can receive up to $44,000 over five years under Medicare or $63,750 over six years under Medicaid for being meaningful users of certified electronic health records.  Hospitals that become meaningful EHR users could receive up to four years of financial incentive payments under Medicare beginning in 2011, and up to six years of incentive payments under Medicaid beginning in October 2010.

The HITECH Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help those who want to improve their care delivery, and will serve as a catalyst to accelerate and smooth the path to HIT adoption by more individual providers and organizations.  The dollars are tangible evidence of a national determination to bring health care into the 21st century.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is charged with coordinating nationwide efforts to implement and use the most advanced health information technology and the electronic exchange of health information. ONC is working with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), through an open and transparent process, on efforts to officially designate what constitutes “meaningful use.”

ONC has already engaged in a broad range of efforts to support the development of a formal definition of meaningful use.  The HITECH Act designated a federal advisory committee, the HIT Policy Committee, with broad representation from major health care constituencies, to provide recommendations to ONC on meaningful use.  The HIT Policy Committee has provided two sets of recommendations, informed by input from a variety of stakeholders.  ONC and CMS have also conducted a series of listening sessions to solicit feedback from more than 200 representatives of various constituent groups and an open comment period where over 800 public comments were submitted and reviewed.  The second set of recommendations on meaningful use was issued at a July 16 HIT Policy Committee meeting and details can be found at healthit.hhs.gov/policycommittee.

CMS is expected to publish a formal definition of meaningful use, for the purposes of receiving the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, by December 31, 2009. At that time, the public will be able to comment on the definition, and such comments will be considered in reaching any final definition of the term.

By focusing on “meaningful use,” we recognize that better health care does not come solely from the adoption of technology itself, but through the exchange and use of health information to best inform clinical decisions at the point of care.  Meaningful use of EHRs, we anticipate, will also enable providers to reduce the amount of time spent on duplicative paperwork and gain more time to spend with their patients throughout the day.  It will lead us toward improvements and sustainability of our health care system that can only be attained with the help of a reliable and secure nationwide electronic health information system.

The concept of meaningful use is simple and inspiring, but we recognize that it becomes significantly more complex at a policy and regulatory level.  As a result, we expect that any formal definition of “meaningful use” must include specific activities health care providers need to undertake to qualify for incentives from the federal government.

Ultimately, we believe “meaningful use” should embody the goals of a transformed health system.  Meaningful use, in the long-term, is when EHRs are used by health care providers to improve patient care, safety, and quality.

What’s next?

As stated above, the next step in our process is a notice of proposed rulemaking in late 2009 with a public comment period in early 2010.  As this process unfolds, we will continue to talk and share experiences about transitioning to EHRs, and to help deepen understanding among physicians and hospitals about the use of EHRs.  We will also present programs designed to help smooth the transition process, and identify activities physicians and hospitals can engage in now to promote adoption of EHRs.  As efforts advance, we will turn our attention to other necessary supporting programs, some of which you will hear more about in the coming weeks, including defining what constitutes a “certified” EHR, which is one of the requirements to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

In the meantime, what can providers do to move toward becoming “meaningful users” – even in the absence of a formal definition?  Naturally, while understanding that the final definition will be adopted through a formal rulemaking process, it will be helpful to be as familiar as possible with the discussion of meaningful use criteria to date.  (You will find that information posted at healthit.hhs.gov/meaningfuluse.)

Armed with an understanding of the discussion of meaningful use as it unfolds, providers can begin to consider how their own practices or organizations might be reshaped to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through the use of an electronic health record system.  Be assured you will not be alone as you seek to adopt an EHR system.  Through our recently announced collaborative HITECH grants programs and others to be initiated later this year, we will continue to support providers in moving forward.  Additional details about the grants are also available in my previous update and at healthit.hhs.gov/HITECHgrants.

To some providers, particularly small or already stretched physician practices or small, rural hospitals, the path toward meaningful use may still seem arduous.  To others, who would just prefer to stick with the “status quo,” it may seem like an unwanted intrusion.  We believe that the time has come for coordinated action.  The price of inaction – in adverse events, lost patient lives, delayed or improper treatments, unnecessary procedures, excessive costs, and so on – is just too high, and will only get worse.

There is much at stake and much to do.  We must relieve the crushing burden of health care costs in this country by improving efficiency, and assuring the highest level of patient care and safety regardless of geography or demographics.  By using current technologies in a meaningful way, as well as technology to be developed in the future, we will take great strides toward solving some of the most vexing problems facing our health care system and creating a new platform for innovative solutions to health care.

I look forward to providing periodic updates, and to continued interactions with all the communities that have so much to gain from this profound transformation.

Sincerely,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo Mail
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • AOL Mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Health Ranker
  • Share/Bookmark
Technology Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory